Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 12:33 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> [...]
Oh, *_hw_smp is new, isn't it? Do we need to wrap it for older I-pipes?
>>> Yes, it was introduced to solve the SMP migration
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 12:33 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [...]
> >> Oh, *_hw_smp is new, isn't it? Do we need to wrap it for older I-pipes?
> >
> > Yes, it was introduced to solve the SMP migration issue actually, so we
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]
>> Oh, *_hw_smp is new, isn't it? Do we need to wrap it for older I-pipes?
>
> Yes, it was introduced to solve the SMP migration issue actually, so we
> need a wrapper. The advantage of having that wrapper instead o
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 01:34 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> [Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
> >>>
> >>> ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cp
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 01:34 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> [Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
>>>
>>> ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cpu
>>> number (or an offset for the per-cpu area) and actually rea
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 11:28 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 01:34 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > [Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
> > >
> > > ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cpu
> > > number (or an
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 01:34 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > [Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
> >
> > ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cpu
> > number (or an offset for the per-cpu area) and actually reading the
> > virtualized
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> [Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
>>
>> ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cpu
>> number (or an offset for the per-cpu area) and actually reading the
>> virtualized interrupt state. Work around this by dis
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
>
> ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cpu
> number (or an offset for the per-cpu area) and actually reading the
> virtualized interrupt state. Work around this by disabling hard IRQs
> while accessing
[Patch is now also available in 'for-upstream']
ipipe_test_pipeline_from is not atomic /wrt reading the current cpu
number (or an offset for the per-cpu area) and actually reading the
virtualized interrupt state. Work around this by disabling hard IRQs
while accessing this service.
This fixes fal
10 matches
Mail list logo
