Philippe Gerum wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
First of all, thx for the CAN stack. Great job.
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 09:58 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Now I would suggest to look at RTCAN (or what it will be called in the
end) and to discuss on this first concrete example how
Hi Wolfgang,
First of all, thx for the CAN stack. Great job.
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 09:58 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > Now I would suggest to look at RTCAN (or what it will be called in the
> > end) and to discuss on this first concrete example how we can proc
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:19 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> instead of replying directly to Wolfgang's announcement of their great
> CAN stack I take the chance to start a generic thread on the future of
> RTDM drivers *within* Xenomai.
>
> If you look at the real-time Linux scene now and in t
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> instead of replying directly to Wolfgang's announcement of their great
>> CAN stack I take the chance to start a generic thread on the future of
>> RTDM drivers *within* Xenomai.
>>
>> If you look at the real-time Linux scene now and in th
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
instead of replying directly to Wolfgang's announcement of their great
CAN stack I take the chance to start a generic thread on the future of
RTDM drivers *within* Xenomai.
If you look at the real-time Linux scene now and in the past, you may
find it fairly scattered. Spec
Hi,
instead of replying directly to Wolfgang's announcement of their great
CAN stack I take the chance to start a generic thread on the future of
RTDM drivers *within* Xenomai.
If you look at the real-time Linux scene now and in the past, you may
find it fairly scattered. Specifically precious Op
