Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi Jan, On 11/28/05, *Jan Kiszka* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... reference to `__raw_read_unlock' kernel/built-in.o: In function `schedule_event': /usr/local/src/linux-2.6.14/kernel/xenomai/nucleus/shadow.c:152:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi Jan, On 11/28/05, *Jan Kiszka* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... reference to `__raw_read_unlock' kernel/built-in.o: In function `schedule_event': /usr/local/src/linux-2.6.14/kernel/xenomai/nucleus/shadow.c:152:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi,I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.On 11/25/05, Ignacio García Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the latest revision (182) and the kernel no longer compiles (fails due to somexnpod_* undefined symbols).Revision

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree. Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA, On 11/25/05, *Ignacio García Pérez* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Jan,On 11/28/05, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... reference to `__raw_read_unlock' kernel/built-in.o: In function `schedule_event': /usr/local/src/linux-2.6.14/kernel/xenomai/nucleus/shadow.c:152: undefined reference to `__raw_read_lock'

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi,I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.On 11/25/05, Ignacio García Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the latest revision (182) and the kernel no longer compiles (fails due to somexnpod_* undefined symbols).Revision

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree. Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA, On 11/25/05, *Ignacio García Pérez* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Jan,On 11/28/05, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... reference to `__raw_read_unlock' kernel/built-in.o: In function `schedule_event': /usr/local/src/linux-2.6.14/kernel/xenomai/nucleus/shadow.c:152: undefined reference to `__raw_read_lock'

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Philippe,On 11/28/05, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA,Sorry :)The problem appears to be gone when disabling the interrupt shield. (An excerpt from my config can be

[Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-25 Thread Ignacio García Pérez
Hi, I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the latest revision (182) and the kernel no longer compiles (fails due to some xnpod_* undefined symbols). Revision 179 compiled fine. Nacho.