Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-25 Thread M. Koehrer
Hi Philippe, as I have mentioned yesterday, I have applied your (first) patch to Xenomai (I did not apply the other additional patches). And yes, my application was running fine without freeze in an overnight test. Not only the tiny test application but also the complex real time application

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-25 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 08:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe, as I have mentioned yesterday, I have applied your (first) patch to Xenomai (I did not apply the other additional patches). The third one would be needed to run the same code against the trunk, due to some difference in CPU

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-25 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum schrieb: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe, I left my test running for a couple of hours - no freeze so far... However, I have to do some other stuff on this machine, I have to stop the

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-25 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 13:40 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum schrieb: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: Now, regarding the deadlock issue, suppressing the RPI-specific locking entirely would have been the best solution, but unfortunately, the migration

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-24 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 19:15 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 17:01 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe, I left my test running for a couple of hours -

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-24 Thread M. Koehrer
Hi Philippe, I have attached this patch to my application. So far it looks really good. However, I leave my test running to be sure that it works. Regards Mathias On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe,

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe, I left my test running for a couple of hours - no freeze so far... However, I have to do some other stuff on this machine, I have to stop the test now...

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 17:01 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 14:16 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe, I left my test running for a couple of hours - no freeze so far... However, I have to do some other

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-20 Thread M. Koehrer
Hi Philippe, I have done my tests on 2.3.1 and I tried to apply the patch on 2.3.1 which worked (with some line offset in the patch...). I wait now for any result. So far everything is running fine. No issues. More later. Regards Mathias Mathias, Could you try applying the attached

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-20 Thread M. Koehrer
Hi Philippe, I left my test running for a couple of hours - no freeze so far... However, I have to do some other stuff on this machine, I have to stop the test now... Regards Mathias Hi Philippe, I have done my tests on 2.3.1 and I tried to apply the patch on 2.3.1 which worked (with

Re: [Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-20 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 13:54 +0200, M. Koehrer wrote: Hi Philippe, I left my test running for a couple of hours - no freeze so far... However, I have to do some other stuff on this machine, I have to stop the test now... Ok, thanks for the feedback. I will send an

[Xenomai-core] RPI is good for you

2007-07-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
Mathias, Could you try applying the attached patch against v2.3.2, and run your box using the failing configuration. This patch is a _preliminary_ attempt at fixing two major issues, it is not complete, and may not even be fully correct since it does not address all the pending issues yet.