Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-07 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: ... Meanwhile I found a solution for the described unterminated trace (put an explicite trace_end at the end of __ipipe_unstall_iret_root), included the irq number in the begin/end report, and stumbled over some other remaining

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-07 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: ... Meanwhile I found a solution for the described unterminated trace (put an explicite trace_end at the end of __ipipe_unstall_iret_root), included the irq number in the begin/end report, and stumbled over some other remaining

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: ... Meanwhile I found a solution for the described unterminated trace (put an explicite trace_end at the end of __ipipe_unstall_iret_root), included the irq number in the begin/end report, and stumbled over some other remaining unterminated trace on a different machine. So,

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: ... Meanwhile I found a solution for the described unterminated trace (put an explicite trace_end at the end of __ipipe_unstall_iret_root), included the irq number in the begin/end report, and stumbled over some other remaining unterminated trace on a different machine. So,

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi again, here comes the first update of the new latency tracer. arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 27 +++ arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c |4 include/asm-i386/system.h | 70 + include/linux/ipipe_trace.h |3 kernel/ipipe/Kconfig | 18 ++

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi again, here comes the first update of the new latency tracer. arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 27 +++ arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c |4 include/asm-i386/system.h | 70 + include/linux/ipipe_trace.h |3 kernel/ipipe/Kconfig | 18 ++

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi again, here comes the first update of the new latency tracer. arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 27 +++ Is there any good reason to patch the callers of __ipipe_handle_irq instead of instrumenting the callee directly? arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c |4

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-05 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi again, here comes the first update of the new latency tracer. arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 27 +++ Is there any good reason to patch the callers of __ipipe_handle_irq instead of instrumenting the callee directly? To capture the