Re: [Xenomai-core] Regarding latency benchmarks

2009-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Shashank Bhatia wrote:
> My CPU is a dual core intel processor 1.8 GHz, and i am using
> xenomai-2.4.8 with 2.6.28.9 kernel.

Hi,

You are still posting to the xenomai-core mailing list whereas you
should post to the xenomai-help mailing list.

I can not reproduce your issue, so could you provide us with the full
compilation and installation logs of both user-space and kernel-space?
And send us your .config too?

And this time use the xenomai-h...@gna.org mailing list.

-- 
  Gilles


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] Regarding latency benchmarks

2009-06-23 Thread Shashank Bhatia
Dear All,

I was trying all latency benchmark programs, in one such session, i had
loaded my linux with some program which will read the hard drive to
create an iso image. This program had taken my Dual core processor to
100%. And both core showed up 100% in gnome-system-monitor.

While this was running, i tried the klatency benchmarks, i got some
strange results :

r...@shashank-desktop:/usr/share/xenomai/testsuite/klatency# ./run 
*
*
* Type ^C to stop this application.
*
*
== Sampling period: 100 us
== Test mode: in-kernel periodic task
== All results in microseconds
warming up...
RTT|  00:00:00  (in-kernel periodic task, 100 us period, priority 99)
RTH|-lat min|-lat avg|-lat max|-overrun|lat best|---lat 
RTD| -2.593|  -2.410|   2.229|   0|  -2.593|   2.229
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2590|  -2.411|  -0.001
RTD| -4.821|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2590|  -2.411|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2585|  -2.381|  -0.001
RTD| -7.202|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2585|  -2.381|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2585|  -2.405|  -0.001
RTD| -9.607|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2585|  -2.405|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2587|  -2.380|  -0.001
RTD|-11.987|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2587|  -2.380|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2579|  -2.360|  -0.001
RTD|-14.347|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2579|  -2.360|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2598|  -2.359|  -0.001
RTD|-16.706|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2598|  -2.359|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2588|  -2.373|  -0.001
RTD|-19.079|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2588|  -2.373|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2668|  -2.397|  -0.001
RTD|-21.476|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2668|  -2.397|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2589|  -2.405|  -0.001
RTD|-23.881|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2589|  -2.405|  -0.001
RTD|100.000|   0.001|   0.000|   -2588|  -2.406|  -0.001
RTD|-26.287|2419.968|  -0.001|   -2588|  -2.406|  -0.001


Then i tried the same with user space latency benchmarks, and these are
the results i got:
r...@shashank-desktop:/usr/share/xenomai/testsuite/latency# ./run 
*
*
* Type ^C to stop this application.
*
*
== Sampling period: 100 us
== Test mode: periodic user-mode task
== All results in microseconds
warming up...
RTT|  00:00:01  (periodic user-mode task, 100 us period, priority 99)
RTH|--lat min|-lat avg|-lat max|-overrun|lat best|---worst
RTD| -0.851|  -0.165|   8.607|   0|  -0.851|   8.607
RTD| -0.861|  -0.297|   8.141|   0|  -0.861|   8.607
RTD| -0.876|  -0.357|   6.562|   0|  -0.876|   8.607
RTD| -0.881|  -0.367|  10.051|   0|  -0.881|  10.051
RTD| -0.871|  -0.214|   6.487|   0|  -0.881|  10.051
RTD| -0.866|  -0.246|   9.038|   0|  -0.881|  10.051
RTD| -0.871|  -0.247|  10.677|   0|  -0.881|  10.677
RTD| -0.886|  -0.307|  10.597|   0|  -0.886|  10.677
RTD| -0.840|  -0.251|  11.880|   0|  -0.886|  11.880
RTD| -0.861|  -0.301|   8.873|   0|  -0.886|  11.880
RTD| -1.081|  -0.415|   6.582|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.891|  -0.395|   7.925|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.896|  -0.352|   8.622|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.896|  -0.398|   9.259|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.881|  -0.287|   7.459|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.891|  -0.155|  10.081|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.871|  -0.147|   8.572|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.861|  -0.232|   6.432|   0|  -1.081|  11.880
RTD| -0.876|  -0.397|  12.181|   0|  -1.081|  12.181
RTD| -0.881|  -0.397|   6.858|   0|  -1.081|  12.181
RTD| -0.886|  -0.349|   6.667|   0|  -1.081|  12.181



My CPU is a dual core intel processor 1.8 GHz, and i am using
xenomai-2.4.8 with 2.6.28.9 kernel.


-Shashank


-
Hi-Tech Gears Limited, Gurgaon, India





___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core