Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm hesitating to
suggest that we apply this unconditionally at xnarch level. Ideas welcome.
Jan
[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/653921
signature.asc
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm hesitating to
suggest that we apply this unconditionally at xnarch level. Ideas welcome.
Yes, I think it makes a lot of sense on powerpc at
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm hesitating to
suggest that we apply this unconditionally at xnarch level. Ideas welcome.
Yes, I think it makes a lot of
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm hesitating to
suggest that we apply this unconditionally at xnarch level. Ideas
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm hesitating to
suggest that we apply this unconditionally at
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm hesitating to
suggest that we apply this
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for non-IO memory, I'm
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
doesn't this patch [1] have some relevance for us as well? As we use
xnarch_remap_io_page_range also for