Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho wrote:
Hi,
The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
applying the patch on a Linux 2.6
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Hi,
The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
applying the patch on a Linux 2.6.13 kernel.
Li
> Hi,
>
> The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
> to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
> include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
> which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
>
> applying the patch on a Linux 2.6.13 kernel.
> Line 1664
Aristeu Sergio Rozanski Filho wrote:
Hi,
The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
applying the patch on a Linux 2.6
Fillod Stephane wrote:
Hi,
The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
applying the patch on a Linux 2.6.13 kernel.
Li
> Hi,
>
> The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
> to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
> include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
> which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
>
> applying the patch on a Linux 2.6.13 kernel.
> Line 1664
Hi,
The adeos-ipipe-2.6.13-ppc-1.0-03.patch file in Xenomai-2.0 dist appears
to be broken. The unified diff format is wrong on
include/asm-ppc/ipipe.h,
which breaks include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h. I've found the problem while
applying the patch on a Linux 2.6.13 kernel.
Line 1664 (no pun :), inste