Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
Hi again,
I looked at the sources now...
Am Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:57 schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi:
Hi,
I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace,
i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support.
I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x8
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
Hi again,
I looked at the sources now...
Am Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:57 schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi:
Hi,
I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace,
i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support.
I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x8
Hi again,
I looked at the sources now...
Am Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:57 schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi:
> Hi,
>
> I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace,
> i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support.
> I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86.
>
> This should a
Hi,
I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace,
i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support.
I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86.
This should alloc the entire heap, according to the API documentation:
rt_heap_create( ..., ..., 1, ... )
rt_heap_alloc( ...
Hi again,
I looked at the sources now...
Am Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:57 schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi:
> Hi,
>
> I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace,
> i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support.
> I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86.
>
> This should a
Hi,
I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace,
i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support.
I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86.
This should alloc the entire heap, according to the API documentation:
rt_heap_create( ..., ..., 1, ... )
rt_heap_alloc( ...