On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 00:08 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
...
To sum up, the UVM support is hard to explain to potential users, adds a
fair amount of confusion when compared to using the direct syscall
interfaces from user-space, and can't evolve up to the point where I
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 02:08 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
...intentionally? I thought those two UVM components were obsoleted by
the full user-space skin support.
They are now obsolete, but a smooth transition requires to have both in
2.2, so that people having based some development over the UVM
Philippe Gerum wrote:
...
To sum up, the UVM support is hard to explain to potential users, adds a
fair amount of confusion when compared to using the direct syscall
interfaces from user-space, and can't evolve up to the point where I
could be happy with them.
Thanks for clarifying. I
...intentionally? I thought those two UVM components were obsoleted by
the full user-space skin support.
On the other hand, the rtai user-space back- and front-end look a bit
premature. Wouldn't it be better to feed this skin into the UVM build
process meanwhile?
Jan
signature.asc
