Re: [Xenomai-core] x86_64: problems with syscall tracing?

Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe, you recently said there is a bug in the x86_64 support when syscall tracing is enabled. Now I think I stepped on it as well: In order to validate my APIC

[Xenomai-core] x86_64: problems with syscall tracing?

Philippe, you recently said there is a bug in the x86_64 support when syscall tracing is enabled. Now I think I stepped on it as well: In order to validate my APIC frequency patches for that arch, I wanted to use LTTng there. But as soon as I start the trace, the latency test fails to run,

Re: [Xenomai-core] x86_64: problems with syscall tracing?

Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe, you recently said there is a bug in the x86_64 support when syscall tracing is enabled. Now I think I stepped on it as well: In order to validate my APIC frequency patches for that arch, I wanted to use LTTng there. But as soon as I start the trace, the latency

Re: [Xenomai-core] x86_64: problems with syscall tracing?

Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe, you recently said there is a bug in the x86_64 support when syscall tracing is enabled. Now I think I stepped on it as well: In order to validate my APIC frequency patches for that arch, I wanted to use LTTng there. But as soon as I start

Re: [Xenomai-core] x86_64: problems with syscall tracing?

Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe, you recently said there is a bug in the x86_64 support when syscall tracing is enabled. Now I think I stepped on it as well: In order to validate my APIC frequency patches for that arch, I wanted to use LTTng there. But as soon