Re: [Xenomai-core] xnpipe: what's up with xnpipe_setup?

2008-10-14 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, xnpipe_setup and the callbacks it sets is dead code for in-tree Xenomai users. Going back to, well, fusion-0.6.9 (the oldest version we have in LXR), it used to be dead meat already at that time. Can we remove it? We can and should emulate the close handler using the

Re: [Xenomai-core] xnpipe: what's up with xnpipe_setup?

2008-10-14 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, xnpipe_setup and the callbacks it sets is dead code for in-tree Xenomai users. Going back to, well, fusion-0.6.9 (the oldest version we have in LXR), it used to be dead meat already at that time. Can we remove it? We can and should emulate the

[Xenomai-core] xnpipe: what's up with xnpipe_setup?

2008-10-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, xnpipe_setup and the callbacks it sets is dead code for in-tree Xenomai users. Going back to, well, fusion-0.6.9 (the oldest version we have in LXR), it used to be dead meat already at that time. Can we remove it? Jan signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Xenomai-core] xnpipe: what's up with xnpipe_setup?

2008-10-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, xnpipe_setup and the callbacks it sets is dead code for in-tree Xenomai users. Going back to, well, fusion-0.6.9 (the oldest version we have in LXR), it used to be dead meat already at that time. Can we remove it? In case we can: --- include/nucleus/pipe.h |5

Re: [Xenomai-core] xnpipe: what's up with xnpipe_setup?

2008-10-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, xnpipe_setup and the callbacks it sets is dead code for in-tree Xenomai users. Going back to, well, fusion-0.6.9 (the oldest version we have in LXR), it used to be dead meat already at that time. Can we remove it? In case we can: Sorry, a better