Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-27 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: misinterpretation. When issuing syscalls with a fixed muxid whereas there is no interface corresponding to this muxid, the nucleus crashes, but it is acceptable, user-space interfaces should issue an __xn_sys_bind syscall first.

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, wondering why suddenly things crash on invoking the latency test, I realised that I turned the nucleus into a module which was not yet loaded. Here is the oops in this case: Correction: the nucleus was still compiled in, the native

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, wondering why suddenly things crash on invoking the latency test, I realised that I turned the nucleus into a module which was not yet loaded. Here is the oops in this case: Correction: the nucleus was still compiled in, the native

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:41 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, wondering why suddenly things crash on invoking the latency test, I realised that I turned the nucleus into a module which was not yet loaded. Here is the oops in this

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] oops on skincall without nucleus being loaded

2006-06-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 15:41 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, wondering why suddenly things crash on invoking the latency test, I realised that I turned the nucleus into a module which was not yet