On 05/04/2010 08:11 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
What I meant is that we could artificially increment the library ABI
version, so that we get in-line with the package name. Of course, we
pretend we broke the ABI whereas we did not really do it, but it looks
harmless (but is it really?).
Am 03.05.2010 20:46, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
Hi Philippe,
Roland Stigge has accepted the group xenomai patch and uploaded xenomai
2.5.2-2 to debian unstable.
I have attached a patch against rpm/for-upstream to sync up with 2.5.2-2.
Please ignore other patches
Roland Stigge wrote:
Hi,
On 05/04/2010 09:43 AM, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
Reading your patch, maybe libxenomai.so.0 should be called libxenomai.so.1 ?
The comment in the libxenomai1.lintian hunk was added by Roland, so it's
probably
better to ask him. Roland, what do you think ?
The
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
Hi Philippe,
Roland Stigge has accepted the group xenomai patch and uploaded xenomai
2.5.2-2 to debian unstable.
I have attached a patch against rpm/for-upstream to sync up with 2.5.2-2.
Please ignore other patches I sent earlier, the attached patch contains them.
