Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I understand the need,

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-23 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-23 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I understand the need, but I will cowardly let Philippe decide whether he likes the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-22 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I understand the need, but I will cowardly let Philippe decide whether he likes the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I understand the need, but I will cowardly let Philippe decide whether he likes the implementation details. I'm

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-22 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I understand the need, but I will cowardly let

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-21 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Slowly moving on toward generic fast mutex support for Xenomai, this patch is a proposal to address the increasing divergence of owner-tracking vs. owner-less xnsynch objects. The services dealing with the former will likely include a new, lockless prologues for the mutex

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-21 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Slowly moving on toward generic fast mutex support for Xenomai, this patch is a proposal to address the increasing divergence of owner-tracking vs. owner-less xnsynch objects. The services dealing with the former will likely include a new, lockless

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-21 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405 always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch: I understand the need, but I will cowardly let Philippe decide whether he likes the implementation details.

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-16 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Slowly moving on toward generic fast mutex support for Xenomai, this patch is a proposal to address the increasing divergence of owner-tracking vs. owner-less xnsynch objects. The services dealing with the former will likely include a new, lockless prologues for the mutex

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release

2008-09-16 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Slowly moving on toward generic fast mutex support for Xenomai, this patch is a proposal to address the increasing divergence of owner-tracking vs. owner-less xnsynch objects. The services dealing with the former will likely include a new, lockless