Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > > > > I am thinking again about this patch: some handlers need to be
>> > > > > rewritten, for example the posix timers handler, because the
>> handler
>> > >
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > > > I am thinking again about this patch: some handlers need to be
> > > > > rewritten, for example the posix timers handler, because the handler
> > > > > relies on the fact that i
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > > I am thinking again about this patch: some handlers need to be
> > > > rewritten, for example the posix timers handler, because the handler
> > > > relies on the fact that it is called for every timer expiry to co
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > I am thinking again about this patch: some handlers need to be
> > > rewritten, for example the posix timers handler, because the handler
> > > relies on the fact that it is called for every timer expiry to compute
> > > the overruns count.
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > I am thinking again about this patch: some handlers need to be
> > rewritten, for example the posix timers handler, because the handler
> > relies on the fact that it is called for every timer expiry to compute
> > the overruns count. So maybe this patch should come with t
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > > A simple patch, just like suggested by Gilles, to avoid looping over
> > > > periodic xntimer handlers in case of overruns.
> > > >
> > > > It saves the current TSC on loop ent
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > A simple patch, just like suggested by Gilles, to avoid looping over
> > > periodic xntimer handlers in case of overruns.
> > >
> > > It saves the current TSC on loop entry and uses this value later when
> > >
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > A simple patch, just like suggested by Gilles, to avoid looping over
> > periodic xntimer handlers in case of overruns.
> >
> > It saves the current TSC on loop entry and uses this value later when
> > forwarding the timer. Is is the overhea
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> A simple patch, just like suggested by Gilles, to avoid looping over
> periodic xntimer handlers in case of overruns.
>
> It saves the current TSC on loop entry and uses this value later when
> forwarding the timer. Is is the overhead of re-reading the TSC on all
> archs
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 09:01 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> A simple patch, just like suggested by Gilles, to avoid looping over
> periodic xntimer handlers in case of overruns.
>
> It saves the current TSC on loop entry and uses this value later when
> forwarding the timer. Is is the overhead of re-re
10 matches
Mail list logo