Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:47 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Gil
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi all,
>
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here is the first apparently working prototype for get
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
> endle
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi all,
here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now
>>>
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
> >> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now
> >> receive a SIGDEBUG even
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
>> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now
>> receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);".
>>
>> The de
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
>> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now
>> receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);".
>>
>> The design follows Gilles' suggesti
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now
> receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);".
>
> The design follows Gilles' suggesti
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of
> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now
> receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);".
>
> The design follows Gilles' suggestion to force a SEGV on victim thread
11 matches
Mail list logo