Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:47 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > >> Philippe Gerum wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Gil

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:18 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Philippe Gerum wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Hi all, >

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> here is the first apparently working prototype for get

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:47 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi all, > > here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of > endle

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi all, here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now >>>

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 08:55 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of > >> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now > >> receive a SIGDEBUG even

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of >> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now >> receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);". >> >> The de

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of >> endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now >> receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);". >> >> The design follows Gilles' suggesti

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-02 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:19 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi all, > > here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of > endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now > receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);". > > The design follows Gilles' suggesti

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] Break out of endless user space loops

2010-06-02 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi all, > > here is the first apparently working prototype for getting hold of > endless user space loops in RT threads. A simple test case of mine now > receive a SIGDEBUG even if it does "while (1);". > > The design follows Gilles' suggestion to force a SEGV on victim thread