On 2011-06-20 22:52, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 10:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> xnarch_switch_to is the central entry point for everyone. It may decide
>> to branch to switch_to or __switch_to, or it simply handles all on its
>> own - that's depending on the arch.
>
> No, the Linux
On 06/20/2011 10:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> xnarch_switch_to is the central entry point for everyone. It may decide
> to branch to switch_to or __switch_to, or it simply handles all on its
> own - that's depending on the arch.
No, the Linux kernel does not know anything about xnarch_switch_to, so
On 2011-06-20 21:51, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 09:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-20 21:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/20/2011 09:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-20 19:33, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
On 06/20/2011 09:41 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-20 21:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/20/2011 09:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-20 19:33, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-20 21:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 09:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-20 19:33, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty t
On 06/20/2011 09:38 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-20 19:33, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty to change it a bit
(replacing the commit concerning
On 2011-06-20 19:33, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty to change it a bit
>>> (replacing the commit concerning unlocked context switches with comments
>>> cha
On 06/20/2011 06:43 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty to change it a bit
>> (replacing the commit concerning unlocked context switches with comments
>> changes only, and changing the commit about xntbase_tick).
On 2011-06-19 17:41, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Merged your whole branch, but took the liberty to change it a bit
> (replacing the commit concerning unlocked context switches with comments
> changes only, and changing the commit about xntbase_tick).
What makes splmax() redundant for the unlocke
On 06/18/2011 03:58 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/18/2011 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 14:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-18 17:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 04:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-18 16:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2011 03:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-18 15:40, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
On 06/18/2011 04:06 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 16:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/18/2011 03:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-18 15:40, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/18/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-18 16:01, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 03:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-18 15:40, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
On 06/18/2011 03:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 15:40, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/18/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2011 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-18 14:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 12:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-18 15:40, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
> Maybe in the irq handlers, we should skip
On 06/18/2011 03:16 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Maybe in the irq handlers, we should skip the XNHTICK replay, when
current_domain is root_dom
On 2011-06-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe in the irq handlers, we should skip the XNHTICK replay, when
>>> current_domain is root_domain.
>>>
>>
>> That would be against the purpose
On 06/18/2011 03:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/18/2011 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-18 14:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/18/2011 12:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-17 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-18 14:56, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-18 14:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2011 12:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-17 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 07:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
On 06/18/2011 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-18 14:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/18/2011 12:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-17 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/17/2011 07:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-17 18:53, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
On 2011-06-18 14:09, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 12:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-17 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2011 07:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-06-17 18:53, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 04:38 PM, GIT version control wrot
On 06/18/2011 12:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-17 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/17/2011 07:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-17 18:53, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 06/17/2011 04:38 PM, GIT version control wrote:
> Module: xenomai-jki
> Branch: for-upstream
On 2011-06-17 20:55, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 07:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-06-17 18:53, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 06/17/2011 04:38 PM, GIT version control wrote:
Module: xenomai-jki
Branch: for-upstream
Commit: 7203b1a66ca0825d5bcda1c3abab9ca0481
On 06/17/2011 07:03 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-06-17 18:53, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 06/17/2011 04:38 PM, GIT version control wrote:
>>> Module: xenomai-jki
>>> Branch: for-upstream
>>> Commit: 7203b1a66ca0825d5bcda1c3abab9ca048177914
>>> URL:
>>> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai
On 2011-06-17 18:53, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 06/17/2011 04:38 PM, GIT version control wrote:
>> Module: xenomai-jki
>> Branch: for-upstream
>> Commit: 7203b1a66ca0825d5bcda1c3abab9ca048177914
>> URL:
>> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-jki.git;a=commit;h=7203b1a66ca0825d5bcda1c3abab9c
On 06/17/2011 04:38 PM, GIT version control wrote:
> Module: xenomai-jki
> Branch: for-upstream
> Commit: 7203b1a66ca0825d5bcda1c3abab9ca048177914
> URL:
> http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-jki.git;a=commit;h=7203b1a66ca0825d5bcda1c3abab9ca048177914
>
> Author: Jan Kiszka
> Date: Fri Jun 17
27 matches
Mail list logo