Re: [Xenomai-core] Build issue with rtcan and I-pipe for linux 2.6.36 on powerpc.

2011-01-05 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
 Hi Gilles,
 
 the attached patch fixes the issue.
 

Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
around

#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE  KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
#define platform_device of_device
#endif

and update the users to the new style.

Jan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Build issue with rtcan and I-pipe for linux 2.6.36 on powerpc.

2011-01-05 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
 Hi Gilles,

 the attached patch fixes the issue.

 
 Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
 around
 
 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE  KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
 #define platform_device of_device
 #endif
 
 and update the users to the new style.

Err... Am I missing the obvious here? If you include
linux/platform_device.h on powerpc you then get a massive mess prior
to 2.6.36.

-- 
Gilles.

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Build issue with rtcan and I-pipe for linux 2.6.36 on powerpc.

2011-01-05 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 05.01.2011 21:25, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
 Hi Gilles,

 the attached patch fixes the issue.


 Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
 around

 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE  KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
 #define platform_device of_device
 #endif

 and update the users to the new style.
 
 Err... Am I missing the obvious here? If you include
 linux/platform_device.h on powerpc you then get a massive mess prior
 to 2.6.36.

Maybe this is an exception, don't know the powerpc details, but
generally our drivers should be written according to latest (supported)
kernel APIs and then extended/wrapped/etc. to compile with older
versions as well.

Jan



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Build issue with rtcan and I-pipe for linux 2.6.36 on powerpc.

2011-01-05 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Am 05.01.2011 21:25, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Am 03.01.2011 11:32, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
 Hi Gilles,

 the attached patch fixes the issue.

 Nothing critical, but I think we should consistently wrap the other way
 around

 #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE  KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
 #define platform_device of_device
 #endif

 and update the users to the new style.
 Err... Am I missing the obvious here? If you include
 linux/platform_device.h on powerpc you then get a massive mess prior
 to 2.6.36.
 
 Maybe this is an exception, don't know the powerpc details, but
 generally our drivers should be written according to latest (supported)
 kernel APIs and then extended/wrapped/etc. to compile with older
 versions as well.

platform_device has existed for a long time in the 2.6 series: the
matching between platform_device and platform_driver is the hack which
replaces enumeration USB and PCI bus provide on embedded systems busses.

Some platforms introduced of_device to handle another kind of
enumeration: the device tree.

Now, it seems the member which were specific to of_device migrated to
the platform_device structure, so, the of_device structure was cancelled
completely, and replaced by platform_device all over the place.

At least, is it my understanding.

Now, we can typedef device_tree_device to be of_device on old kernels,
and platform_device on new kernels, but using of_device for this does
not seem stupid either.

-- 
Gilles.

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Build issue with rtcan and I-pipe for linux 2.6.36 on powerpc.

2011-01-03 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hi Gilles,

the attached patch fixes the issue.

On 01/02/2011 08:53 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 
 Hi Wolfgang,
 
 It seems we have an issue building rtcan for mpc5xxx with Linux 2.6.36.
 As far as I understood the of_device structure disappeared and the
 device tree bits were integrated in the device structure, which causes
 several errors when building ksrc/drivers/can/mscan/rtcan_mscan_mpc5xxx.c
 
 Build log details here:
 http://sisyphus.hd.free.fr/~gilles/bx/lite5200/2.6.36-ppc_6xx-gcc-4.2.2/log.html#1

Wolfgang.
From 94e2e92946a74bed44b9be208a3cef43e3e52477 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:59:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] wrappers: fixup struct of_device for RTCAN MPC5xxx driver

Since 2.6.36, of_device is just an alias for platform_device.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger w...@grandegger.com
---
 include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h |4 
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h b/include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h
index 7f1214a..fb49307 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h
@@ -191,4 +191,8 @@ typedef irq_handler_t rthal_irq_host_handler_t;
 #define mpc5xxx_get_bus_frequency(node)	mpc52xx_find_ipb_freq(node)
 #endif
 
+#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE = KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,36)
+#define of_device platform_device
+#endif
+
 #endif /* _XENO_ASM_POWERPC_WRAPPERS_H */
-- 
1.7.2.3

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Build issue with rtcan and I-pipe for linux 2.6.36 on powerpc.

2011-01-03 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
 Hi Gilles,
 
 the attached patch fixes the issue.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Gilles.

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core