Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe latency tracer for ppc

2006-05-02 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: ... This trace covers some long stall of the root domain, not the maximum stall of the Xenomai domain that caused the 140 us above. See the explanation for the stall bits above. Ah, some feed for the

Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe latency tracer for ppc

2006-05-01 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Philippe Gerum wrote: As promised, the I-pipe tracer has been ported to ppc. People working on this architecture are invited to give it a try, it's a great tool to find out where the cycles are actually going. Just apply the tracer patch on top of the Adeos patch bearing the same revision

Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe latency tracer for ppc

2006-05-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: As promised, the I-pipe tracer has been ported to ppc. People working on this architecture are invited to give it a try, it's a great tool to find out where the cycles are actually going. Just apply the tracer patch on top of the Adeos patch

Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe latency tracer for ppc

2006-05-01 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: As promised, the I-pipe tracer has been ported to ppc. People working on this architecture are invited to give it a try, it's a great tool to find out where the cycles are actually going. Just apply the tracer patch on top of

Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe latency tracer for ppc

2006-05-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: ... This trace covers some long stall of the root domain, not the maximum stall of the Xenomai domain that caused the 140 us above. See the explanation for the stall bits above. Ah, some feed for the real experts.