Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 10:22 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>>Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
>>>However, after looking at the ARM patch, I am not so sure
>>>__ipipe_update_all_pinned_mm() is the way to go on all architectures.
>>>The ARM I-pipe handles vmalloc and iore
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 10:22 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > However, after looking at the ARM patch, I am not so sure
> > __ipipe_update_all_pinned_mm() is the way to go on all architectures.
> > The ARM I-pipe handles vmalloc and ioremap faults without causing
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> However, after looking at the ARM patch, I am not so sure
> __ipipe_update_all_pinned_mm() is the way to go on all architectures.
> The ARM I-pipe handles vmalloc and ioremap faults without causing a mode
> switch, I wonder if it is not better than having
> __ipipe_upd
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 16:18 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>>Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>
>>>This was run on x86, but need further testing before inclusion.
>>
>>Here is a new version, after testing. It appears to run fine. I tested
>>forking in real-time applicatio
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 16:18 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > This was run on x86, but need further testing before inclusion.
>
> Here is a new version, after testing. It appears to run fine. I tested
> forking in real-time applications both before and after call
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> This was run on x86, but need further testing before inclusion.
Here is a new version, after testing. It appears to run fine. I tested
forking in real-time applications both before and after calling
rt_task_shadow, and vmallocing areas of 256 Mo, and memseting them bo
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> It is a patch for x86 only for now, other architectures will be
> implemented when it is stable on x86.
By the way, I could not find where the page faults for vmalloc/ioremap
areas are handled on ppc, does anybody have a clue ?
--
Niklaus Giger wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 19:05 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
>
>>Hi,
>
> <..>
>
>>This was run on x86, but need further testing before inclusion.
>
> I wanted to give it a try on my PPC board. But trying to apply it (on a
> Linxu
> 2.6.19.1 kernel patched with
> k
Am Mittwoch, 10. Januar 2007 19:05 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
> Hi,
<..>
> This was run on x86, but need further testing before inclusion.
I wanted to give it a try on my PPC board. But trying to apply it (on a Linxu
2.6.19.1 kernel patched with
ksrc/arch/powerpc/patches/adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-pp
