Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not doing the
same linking dance for the other skins as well? Or do you also prefer
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the
xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not
doing the
same linking dance for the other skins as
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the
xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not
doing the
same linking dance for the other
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not doing the
same linking dance for the other skins as well? Or do you also prefer
that user include
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not doing the
same linking dance for the other skins as well? Or do you also prefer
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the
xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not
doing the
same linking dance for the other skins as
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
But this raised the question to me again if we really need the
xenomai
prefix for all the skin headers /from within xenomai/. Why not
doing the
same linking dance for the other