[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know the actual state of the LinuxTraceTool respectively
the ngLtt ?
Is it applicable for Xenomai (I know, that the tracepoints are already
supported by Xenomai).
Or even better, is anybody already using ngLtt with Xenomai.
Thank you for your information
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest# modprobe xeno_switchtest
[ 160.221018] Xenomai: starting RTDM services.
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest#
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest# switch -n
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest# switch rtk0
cpu 0: 498
cpu 0: 998
cpu 0:
Prashanti Bedapudi wrote:
Attached is a piece of code using alarms, but I am seeing some unexpected
behavior. Any help will be appreciated.
have a look at src/testsuite/latency
it does what I believe youre seeking to do (tho I havent read your code)
in function main() the program
Sean McGranaghan wrote:
Hello all,
I am configuring a new PC for Xenomai 2.1 with a 2.6.16 kernel. In the
past I have always used a vanilla kernel in the default configuration.
I was wondering what features are recommended to enable or disable in
the default kernel configuration? For example
Saul wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested in hearing from people about the PC's that you use
that are known to work well with Xenomai. I'd be looking for a fast new
desktop PC for image processing and aircraft control tasks. Is AMD a
better bet?
Any suggestions much appreciated.
Saul.
Can
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Tobias Marschall wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 13 April 2006 21:00, you wrote:
I saw a similar error when using --enable-x86-sep and not
having NPTL
enabled in glibc.
Try configuring without --enable-x86-sep
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Tobias Marschall wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 13 April 2006 21:00, you wrote:
I saw a similar error when using --enable-x86-sep and not having NPTL
enabled in glibc.
Try configuring without --enable-x86-sep (used in the README.INSTALL
Pentium x86
Tobias Marschall wrote:
Hallo,
I've been using rtai until now and decided to give xenomai (release 2.1) a
try. I followed the instructions from README.INSTALL, and everything (kernel
patching, compilation, etc.) went fine. Then I tried to run the latency test,
which failed:
---
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Steven Seeger wrote:
Again, the only way to make your point here would be to run the
latency test
in user-space, disabling the periodic timing at configuration level
(v2.1 only),
and making sure that no SMI source is active. If the results
actually show
performance
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Im having trouble with built/installed xenomai,
soekris:/usr/realtime/2.6.13-ski7-v1# insmod
testsuite/klatency/latency_rt.ko
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: Unknown symbol rt_task_delete
Im having trouble with built/installed xenomai,
soekris:/usr/realtime/2.6.13-ski7-v1# insmod
testsuite/klatency/latency_rt.ko
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: Unknown symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Im having trouble with built/installed xenomai,
soekris:/usr/realtime/2.6.13-ski7-v1# insmod
testsuite/klatency/latency_rt.ko
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: Unknown symbol rt_task_delete
12 matches
Mail list logo