Gilles Chanteperdrix escreveu:
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> Is there a cleaner way to make possible to put comments inside the @code
> command?
What about putting the commented code in a separate file and including
it with \include ?
That is a good idea, but it does not worth in my ca
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> Is there a cleaner way to make possible to put comments inside the @code
> command?
What about putting the commented code in a separate file and including
it with \include ?
--
Gilles Chanteperdrix.
__
Thank you Gilles and Jan,
Jan, I had taken a look at that thread just after I created this thread.
Well, at least, now I know this fault is expected and is not an error.
Do I need to make a dummy float-point operation in primary mode for avoiding
unexpected higher latency for enabling FPU in cr
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at /proc/xenomai/faults and noticed that the only errors
> were on TRAP 7 (FPU not available).
>
> Each time I run the user-space program using the native skin, I
> increment the fault by one. I don't understand why this happens. Fro
Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was looking at /proc/xenomai/faults and noticed that the only errors
> were on TRAP 7 (FPU not available).
>
> Each time I run the user-space program using the native skin, I
> increment the fault by one. I don't understand why this happens. From
> docum
Hi,
I was looking at /proc/xenomai/faults and noticed that the only errors
were on TRAP 7 (FPU not available).
Each time I run the user-space program using the native skin, I
increment the fault by one. I don't understand why this happens. From
documentation, FPU should be enabled automatica
