hello,
Thank you for helping me solve my problem.
You recommend me to update to a more recent version. But I think the
xenomai version 2.6.0 is the lastest version over http://www.xenomai.org
site.
By the way, i have a short question. When i make run cross-link program, i
don't understand why
On 04/25/2012 11:11 AM, Minh GIANG wrote:
hello,
Thank you for helping me solve my problem.
You recommend me to update to a more recent version. But I think the
xenomai version 2.6.0 is the lastest version over http://www.xenomai.org
site.
You are right. The latest fixes are in the git
On 04/11/2012 10:51 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
ok for CC, i was afraid of spam everyone by my mail. I answer your
questions.
- non, i didn't modify cross-link program (even if i used to modify this
program to make it run, but it worked the same way)
- Xenomai 2.6
What version (cat
Hello sir,
Here is the message after doing your command:
giang@debianrt:~/Documents/xenomai-2.6.0/examples/rtdm/profiles/serial$
make XENO=/usr/xenomai/bin
--xeno-cflags is deprecated, use --skin=name --cflags instead
--xeno-ldflags is deprecated, use --skin=name --ldflags instead
gcc
On 04/12/2012 10:51 AM, Minh GIANG wrote:
Hello sir,
Here is the message after doing your command:
giang@debianrt:~/Documents/xenomai-2.6.0/examples/rtdm/profiles/serial$
make XENO=/usr/xenomai/bin
--xeno-cflags is deprecated, use --skin=name --cflags instead
--xeno-ldflags is
Hi,
On 04/05/2012 02:46 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
i'm sorry sir, what i displayed just in the last mail, isn't good, because
i removed rt_dev_ioctl(...) in cross-link program
And then, with rt_dev_ioctl( RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT ).
[93076.465077] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4
[93076.465082] base=0x2f8
On 04/11/2012 04:19 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi,
On 04/05/2012 02:46 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
i'm sorry sir, what i displayed just in the last mail, isn't good, because
i removed rt_dev_ioctl(...) in cross-link program
And then, with rt_dev_ioctl( RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT ).
On 04/11/2012 06:56 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 04/11/2012 04:19 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi,
On 04/05/2012 02:46 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
i'm sorry sir, what i displayed just in the last mail, isn't good, because
i removed rt_dev_ioctl(...) in cross-link program
And then, with
On 04/11/2012 06:59 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 04/11/2012 06:56 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 04/11/2012 04:19 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi,
On 04/05/2012 02:46 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
i'm sorry sir, what i displayed just in the last mail, isn't good, because
i removed
ok for CC, i was afraid of spam everyone by my mail. I answer your
questions.
- non, i didn't modify cross-link program (even if i used to modify this
program to make it run, but it worked the same way)
- Xenomai 2.6
- Linux 2.6.38 and patch Adeos 2.6.38 of course
- i build the program in
On 04/04/2012 11:18 AM, Minh GIANG wrote:
hello,
i did what you told me, i compiled the kernet with patch which you send me,
and the result of dmesg
[ 1636.156641] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1
[ 1636.157672] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4
[ 1636.157675] base=0x2f8 status=0x100
[ 1636.157677] base=0x2f8
hello,
my configuration : linux 2.6.38, patch adeos 2.6.38 and xenomai 2.6
compiled with linux Debian 6.0(Squezze) architecture amd64-Athlon
in any case, i saw the list displays the same thing. Maybe im wrong in
display what you want to see?
[92367.750709] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4
[92367.750711]
hello,
i did what you told me, i compiled the kernet with patch which you send me,
and the result of dmesg
[ 1636.156641] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1
[ 1636.157672] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4
[ 1636.157675] base=0x2f8 status=0x100
[ 1636.157677] base=0x2f8 iir=0x1
[ 1636.158713] base=0x2f8 iir=0x4
[ 1636.158715]
hello,
i don't know how call the function rt_dev_ioctl() after the timeout
happened, this function is called in the begining of while loop
(cross-link program).
I get the value of struct rtser_status,
line status = 96
modem status = 176
to be honest, i don't know why cross-line program works
On 04/02/2012 10:25 AM, Minh GIANG wrote:
hello,
i don't know how call the function rt_dev_ioctl() after the timeout
happened, this function is called in the begining of while loop
(cross-link program).
I get the value of struct rtser_status,
line status = 96
modem status = 176
to be
On 03/29/2012 05:26 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
i want to revive the topic over the problem RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT
while compiling cross-link.c program. I cann't resolve my problem
after doing some solution given by the others
Loading module:
insmod ./xeno_16550A.ko io=0x3f8,0x2f8 irq=4,3
On 03/30/2012 01:15 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
hello,
after testing a lot of time, i have one port which doesn't work well in
writing (material problem i think). Now it works in writing and reading
with one condtion that i have to remove the function
err=rt_dev_ioctl(...) because it returns
hi,
with option RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT in rt_dev_ioctl(), this function returns
un number -110 (Connection timed out)
with option RTSER_RTIOC_GET_STATUS in rt_dev_ioctl(), this function returns
un number 0 (not message)
Anyway, currently it works without rt_dev_ioctl(), i can see rt_dev_read()
On 03/30/2012 04:34 PM, Minh GIANG wrote:
hi,
with option RTSER_RTIOC_WAIT_EVENT in rt_dev_ioctl(), this function returns
un number -110 (Connection timed out)
with option RTSER_RTIOC_GET_STATUS in rt_dev_ioctl(), this function returns
un number 0 (not message)
You should call this
19 matches
Mail list logo
