Il 01/07/21 08:38, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 28.06.21 16:33, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
d98c99798836dd3571144203b51ff787d2108f1b) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel from Xenomai repos, in Cobalt
coniguration.
Just
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
d98c99798836dd3571144203b51ff787d2108f1b) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel from Xenomai repos, in Cobalt
coniguration.
Just for completeness, I'm using a Yocto built filesystem (but I think
it doesn't matter to
Il 28/06/21 16:33, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
d98c99798836dd3571144203b51ff787d2108f1b) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel from Xenomai repos, in Cobalt
coniguration.
Just for completeness, I'm using a Yocto
Il 09/09/21 20:44, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 07.09.21 11:21, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
..snip..
Starting from a number of tasks > 4, the VMEM got a jump and then
increases very rapidly.
Is it normal? Or I'm misusing the rt_printf?
No, that's related to glibc's internal mem
Il 19/07/21 10:10, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Il 16/07/21 16:58, Philippe Gerum ha scritto:
Mauro S. writes:
Il 16/07/21 14:06, Philippe Gerum ha scritto:
Mauro S. via Xenomai writes:
Hi,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
bca41678742be80c3a0d5a01935c671c385a95a1
Hi all,
consider the simple code attached.
I'm using Xenomai 3.1 on a x86_64 CPU, 2GB RAM.
I compile and link the code using "xeno-config --skin=alchemy --cflags"
and "xeno-config --skin=alchemy --ldflags"
* Scenario 1)
#define printf rt_printf commented out (use printf for prints)
Il 07/09/21 11:21, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Hi all,
consider the simple code attached.
I'm using Xenomai 3.1 on a x86_64 CPU, 2GB RAM.
I compile and link the code using "xeno-config --skin=alchemy --cflags"
and "xeno-config --skin=alchemy --ldflags"
* Scenario
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai 3.1.1 in cobalt mode, on x84_64.
Please consider the attached simple test code.
When I start the application, I never see the "Pipe task running" printf.
When I close application (ctrl+c), rt_pipe_join() on pipe task hangs.
Analyzing the code with gdb, the timeout
Il 06/10/21 13:30, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Il 06/10/21 12:26, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 06.10.21 09:00, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
On 05.10.21 18:00, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
On 25.09.21 18:20, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai 3.1.1 in cobalt mode
Il 06/10/21 12:26, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 06.10.21 09:00, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
On 05.10.21 18:00, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
On 25.09.21 18:20, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai 3.1.1 in cobalt mode, on x84_64.
Please consider the attached simple test code
Il 16/07/21 16:58, Philippe Gerum ha scritto:
Mauro S. writes:
Il 16/07/21 14:06, Philippe Gerum ha scritto:
Mauro S. via Xenomai writes:
Hi,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
bca41678742be80c3a0d5a01935c671c385a95a1) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel
Il 16/07/21 14:06, Philippe Gerum ha scritto:
Mauro S. via Xenomai writes:
Hi,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
bca41678742be80c3a0d5a01935c671c385a95a1) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel from Xenomai repos, in Cobalt
coniguration. SMI workaround
Hi,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
bca41678742be80c3a0d5a01935c671c385a95a1) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel from Xenomai repos, in Cobalt
coniguration. SMI workaround is enabled and all latency tests are good.
I'm facing with a very weird problem in
Il 16/07/21 11:47, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 16.07.21 11:45, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Xenomai3 (master branch, commit
bca41678742be80c3a0d5a01935c671c385a95a1) on a X86_64bit Intel Atom
x5-E8000 with 2GB RAM, using kernel from Xenomai repos, in Cobalt
coniguration. SMI
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai 3.1.2 on a Intel Atom x5-E8000 64bit with an Intel
I210 gigabit ethernet controller. Linux kernel is 5.4.181.
I have two identical devices, one configured as master:
-
$ cat /etc/rtnet.conf
prefix="/usr"
exec_prefix="/usr"
RTNET_MOD="/lib/modules/`uname
Il 21/03/22 15:27, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai 3.1.2 on a Intel Atom x5-E8000 64bit with an Intel
I210 gigabit ethernet controller. Linux kernel is 5.4.181.
I have two identical devices, one configured as master:
---8<---
usercopy: Kernel memory expos
Il 21/03/22 17:28, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 21.03.22 17:25, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
On 21.03.22 15:40, Mauro via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using Xenomai 3.1.2 on a Intel Atom x5-E8000 64bit with an Intel
I210 gigabit ethernet controller. Linux kernel is 5.4.181.
I have two identical
Some cards are slow to get the connection link up after the
"rtifconfig rteth0 up" command, e.g. on an Atom-x5 with an Intel I210
(rt_igb driver) I detected approximately 3 seconds to get the link up.
On master, the "rtifconfig rteth0 up" is followed by TDMA configuration and
start. After the
Some cards are slow to get the connection link up after the
"rtifconfig rteth0 up" command, e.g. on an Atom-x5 with an Intel I210
(rt_igb driver) I detected approximately 3 seconds to get the link up.
On master, the "rtifconfig rteth0 up" is followed by TDMA configuration and
start. After the
Il 22/04/22 18:55, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 22.04.22 16:25, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Some cards are slow to get the connection link up after the
"rtifconfig rteth0 up" command, e.g. on an Atom-x5 with an Intel I210
(rt_igb driver) I detected approximately 3 seconds to get t
Hi Florian,
thanks for your comments. See below mine.
Il 23/04/22 19:26, Florian Bezdeka ha scritto:
Hi all,
some minor comments, see below:
On 22.04.22 20:58, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Some cards are slow to get the connection link up after the
"rtifconfig rteth0 up" co
Il 05/05/22 17:04, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Il 05/05/22 15:05, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 03.05.22 17:18, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use RTNet with TDMA.
I succesfully set up my bus:
- 1GBps speed
- 3 devices
- cycle time 1ms
- timeslots with 200us offset
I
Remaning shellcheck warnings:
- "SC2086: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting."
line 120, 153, 289 (variables STAGE_2_OPT and NETMASK_OPT)
Suggested fix not applicable because these variables can be empty,
resulting in command failure due to "" in command line
- "SC2153:
Il 24/05/22 08:33, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 13.05.22 14:51, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Il 05/05/22 17:04, Mauro S. via Xenomai ha scritto:
Il 05/05/22 15:05, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 03.05.22 17:18, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use RTNet with TDMA.
I succesfully set
Hi all,
I'm trying to use RTNet with TDMA.
I succesfully set up my bus:
- 1GBps speed
- 3 devices
- cycle time 1ms
- timeslots with 200us offset
I wrote a simple application that in parallel receives and sends UDP
packets on TDMA bus.
- sendto() is done to the broadcast address, port
Signed-off-by: Mauro Salvini
---
utils/net/rtnet.in | 76 +++---
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils/net/rtnet.in b/utils/net/rtnet.in
index f81a7bb0a..06e796cd2 100644
--- a/utils/net/rtnet.in
+++ b/utils/net/rtnet.in
@@
Il 26/04/22 17:18, Bezdeka, Florian ha scritto:
On Tue, 2022-04-26 at 16:24 +0200, Mauro S. wrote:
Hi Florian,
thanks for your comments. See below mine.
Il 23/04/22 19:26, Florian Bezdeka ha scritto:
Hi all,
some minor comments, see below:
[snip]
+ The parameter -d allows to
Il 05/05/22 17:25, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 05.05.22 17:12, Mauro S. wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mauro Salvini
---
utils/net/rtnet.in | 76 +++---
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils/net/rtnet.in b/utils/net/rtnet.in
index
Signed-off-by: Mauro Salvini
---
utils/net/rtnet.in | 76 +++---
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils/net/rtnet.in b/utils/net/rtnet.in
index f81a7bb0a..9f136b804 100644
--- a/utils/net/rtnet.in
+++ b/utils/net/rtnet.in
@@
Il 05/05/22 15:05, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
On 03.05.22 17:18, Mauro S. via Xenomai wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use RTNet with TDMA.
I succesfully set up my bus:
- 1GBps speed
- 3 devices
- cycle time 1ms
- timeslots with 200us offset
I wrote a simple application that in parallel receives
30 matches
Mail list logo
