Re: XML DECLARATION

2003-11-12 Thread Mark Van Orman
Hi Gareth, That would be great. Thanks. Regards and thanks, Mark Van Orman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should you have further questions, please contact the ICS Customer Care Team: email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Gareth Reakes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24654] New: - openFile function opens files for reading and writing instead of reading only.

2003-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XML DECLARATION

2003-11-12 Thread Gareth Reakes
Ooops, looking at the spec there appears to be a feature we do not support called xml-declaration. We are quite behind the specs in the DOM 3 stuff at the moment. I have no problem adding the feature in to our current features if it is a requirement for you. Gareth On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Ga

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24634] - DOMWriter fails to write SYSTEM identifier

2003-11-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: XML DECLARATION

2003-11-12 Thread Gareth Reakes
Hi, sorry about the length of time to reply. It is an absolute mad house here. DOMWriter always adds the xml decl and there is not a feature "fgXMLDeclString". Why is it you do not want the decl? Gareth -- Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development +44-1865-203192 DecisionSoft Lim

identifying the version of serialized grammars

2003-11-12 Thread David Cargill
For the serializing/deserializing effort the initial idea was to use the project Version Release Modification (VRM) to identify what version the serialized file is at. This would work fine for the actual releases of the project. However, since we frequently request user's to get the latest co

Re: Re: Default Values

2003-11-12 Thread Graham Mann
Mathias, 'Scuse me for butting in but... Is there a reason why you want to validate when reading but not use the schema default values. I can see advantages in either having both or having none ... At 12/11/2003 12:20 Wednesday, Mathias Mueller wrote: >Hi Anton, > >yeah, this command does it.

Re: Re: Default Values

2003-11-12 Thread Mathias Mueller
Hi Anton, yeah, this command does it. I had to force him to convert the DOMNode to DOMAttr, but it works. :) Thanks for the quick help. Mathias P.S. I strangely received your mail 3 times. Any idea why? > Hi Mathias, > > you can add a check on your attributes: > if (pAttr->getSpecified()) retu

Re: Default Values

2003-11-12 Thread Anton Triest
Hi Mathias, you can add a check on your attributes: if (pAttr->getSpecified()) returns false, it's a default value from the DTD HTH, Anton - Original Message - From: "Mathias Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 12:51 PM Subject: Defa

Default Values

2003-11-12 Thread Mathias Mueller
Hi, I am using the XercesDOMParser with validation. The Parser is not only reading out the information stored in the XML-file but also all the not stored attributes with their default values. No I wanna know how to turn that of. I have the default values stored in my own structure and it would