@xml.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Building Xerces 2.3.0 with GCC 3.4.2 on Solaris5.8!!!
> from XMLString.cpp:74:
>
/user/sbhatnag/xerces/xerces-c-src_2_3_0/include/xercesc/util/RefArrayVectorOf.c:
> In destructor
`xercesc_2_3::RefArrayVectorOf::~RefArrayVectorOf()
> from XMLString.cpp:74:
>
/user/sbhatnag/xerces/xerces-c-src_2_3_0/include/xercesc/util/RefArrayVectorOf.c:
> In destructor
`xercesc_2_3::RefArrayVectorOf::~RefArrayVectorOf()':
>
/user/sbhatnag/xerces/xerces-c-src_2_3_0/include/xercesc/util/RefArrayVectorOf.c:25:
> error:
Hi,
Version 1.4 is very old. Can you try a newer version? People are more
likely to be able to help you with errors then.
Gareth
On 25 Nov 2004, at 16:44, Daniel Donovan wrote:
Hello, I have been trying to build a static xerces library on a Linux
i686 box with no joy.
You have to dos2unix all
Message -
From: "James Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: Building Xerces with CodeWarrior 9.x
Hi Peter,
I confess to having let the codewarri
Hi Peter,
I confess to having let the codewarrior ports lapse, to some degree. I
don't own CodeWarrior 9, and so haven't been testing in that
environment. If you have any patches to contribute I'd be happy to get
them into the xerces source...
It looks like CodeWarrior may be complaining about
My understanding is that Intel's 64-bit architecture is
different from AMD's. It would not surprise me at all to learn that Intel's
compiler cannot generate code for AMD chips. Do you know whether it can? If not,
you may need to consider GCC.
From: Lakkundi, Vijayendra R
[mailto:[
Lakkundi, Vijayendra R wrote:
.\..\..\..\..\..\Build\Win64\VC6\Release\obj\Win32PlatformUtils.obj :
fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'AMD64' conflicts with target
machine type 'IA64'
Projects are configured for IA64 (Intel Itanium), not for AMD64. You can
change all occurences of IA64 to
Hi Alberto,
I followed your instructions precisely and had the same problem...in
fact I'm reasonably sure that's what I did before, too, and just didn't
report it correctly in my earlier message. I'm beginning to suspect
there is something wrong with my installation of VC 7.1 or something
else
Hi Alberto,
If what was in my earlier message was accurate (not positive about that,
unfortunately), your suggestion sounds promising. Thanks very much!
Joanne
Alberto Massari wrote:
Hi Joanne,
that's strange, as I am able to build Xerces using VC 7.1. The only
thing that's different is that I
Hi Joanne,
that's strange, as I am able to build Xerces using VC 7.1. The only thing
that's different is that I open the xerces-all.sln file found in the
\Projects\Win32\VC7\xerces-all, while you seem to be opening
the all.vcproj found in the "all" subdirectory.
If this is true, can you try open
> >I've been building my own binaries for use with Xalan-C++ for months
> >without any issues.
> >
> >
> Are you also using Visual C++ .Net 2003? If so, is there anything
> different about your procedure?
We are using 2003, and there's no change in what we're doing. We just let
2003 translat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sequence of events has been something like this:
I double-click on the VC7 project file for all.
MSDev converts all the project file stuff to be 7.1 compatible.
So, you're using Visual C++ .Net 2003?
Yes. I do most of my development on Linux, but our stuff has
> The sequence of events has been something like this:
>
> I double-click on the VC7 project file for all.
>
> MSDev converts all the project file stuff to be 7.1 compatible.
So, you're using Visual C++ .Net 2003?
> I try to run DOMCount. A dialog comes up:
>
> "These project configurations
Hi,
I have compiled the xerces-c-src_2_5_0
using gcc 3.3.2 on Solaris 2.8
I believe your problem is that it is
trying to use the wrong ld
Make sure that the GNU ld is used first (and it is installed)
I hope this helps,
Mariella
At 10:33 AM 4/29/2004 +0800, you
wrote:Anybody
has sucess stor
What I have done in the past was to take all the .o
files and stuff them in a libxerces-c1_4_0.a library.
Briefly:
cd $XERCES_ROOT/obj/SOLARIS
ar r libxerces-c1_4_0.a *.o
And then put the libxerces-c1_4_0.a wherever it belongs.
All I can promise is that it worked for me Perhaps a
m
?
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: Juan Julian Merelo Guervos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building Xerces-c as static lib
Eyal Rif escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I build Xerces-c on Linux as stat
Eyal Rif escribió:
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I build Xerces-c on Linux as static lib (.a) and not as shared lib
> (.so) ?
>
> Any help/suggestion will be appreciated...
>
Erase -shared from src/Makefile.incl
Kinda tricky, but it works.
J
--
AEB'02 => http://aeb02.unex.es
Dream => http://dr-ea-m.
Thanks Jason..
Nikita
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
> "Nikita Sawant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I just posted this :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to build Xerces 1.5.1 on solaris. I get the following output
> >
> > when running the runConfigure script:
> >
> > ./runConfigure -psolaris -c
"Nikita Sawant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just posted this :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build Xerces 1.5.1 on solaris. I get the following output
>
> when running the runConfigure script:
>
> ./runConfigure -psolaris -ccc -xCC -d -micu -ticu -rpthread
> Generating makefiles with the fol
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building xerces on Solaris 2.6 - CC V5.0
"Horn, Nancy" wrote:
>
> Then - I tried to build my application with it and got the
> following. The EXACT same
> undefineds as I got with the V4.2 CC compiler (3 days ago!):
>
> /opt/SUNWspro/SC5.0/
"Horn, Nancy" wrote:
>
> Then - I tried to build my application with it and got the
> following. The EXACT same
> undefineds as I got with the V4.2 CC compiler (3 days ago!):
>
> /opt/SUNWspro/SC5.0/bin/CC -L/opt/SUNWspro/SC5.0/lib -I. -w -O
> -I/usr/home/nhorn/xerces-c-src1_5_1/include
FYI --
I just spent another whole day (first getting all the gnu tools)
re-building xerces 1.5.1
on Solaris using V5.0 CC.
It built cleanly, just like the script.
Then - I tried to build my application with it and got the
following. The EXACT same
undefineds
"Horn, Nancy" wrote:
>
> Has anyone successfully built xerces_5_0_1.so from the sources
> (ibm4c-src_3_5_0)
> using Solaris CC Version 5.0?
I've built libxerces-c1_5_1.so from xerces-c-src1_5_1.tar using CC 5.0 on
Solaris 5.7 and the native transcoder without problems. I've had problems
"Downey, Nathan" wrote:
>
> Has anyone built xerces on the cygwin platform?
Hi,
I have given it a try. Not a real success, because configuration failed
already on pthreads library which is in cygwin case built-in to the
cygwin.dll and the implementation is not complete. Another question is
whet
24 matches
Mail list logo