RE: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-30 Thread Dean Roddey
Dean Roddey Software Geek Extraordinaire Portal, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Boris Tarasyuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: namespaces and Valid XML Same way I can say that not everything clear with X

RE: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-30 Thread Dean Roddey
to, the DTD based validation cannot check for that. -- Dean Roddey Software Geek Extraordinaire Portal, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Boris Tarasyuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 7:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: namesp

Re: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-27 Thread Boris Tarasyuk
Same way I can say that not everything clear with Xerces. When validating parser meets attribute, which is not declared in DTD, it has to report error. And Xerces does report. But if attribute starts from 'xmlns:' Xerces does not report error. So, if we agree that namespaces and DTDs are not reall

Re: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-27 Thread Dean Roddey
> Thanks Dean and Joseph for the answers. > That exactly what I suspected, but would like > to get third party's opinion. > I don't think that this is bug in MS Parser (successful > validation of element with namespace prefix if it declared in DTD > without namespace prefix). Rather it's feature.

Re: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-27 Thread Boris Tarasyuk
Probably they do 'nonstandard validation'. But you don't need turn on it explicitly. IE can recognize it. This is example: 1. content text Validation correct. Namespace is declared 2. content text Validation failed. Namespace is not declared > > Sorry, but it ex

Re: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-27 Thread Joseph_Kesselman
>I don't think that this is bug in MS Parser (successful >validation of element with namespace prefix if it declared in DTD >without namespace prefix). Rather it's feature. Sorry, but it explicitly violates the XML spec's definition of validity, so if they're claiming to be a validating XML pars

Re: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-27 Thread Boris Tarasyuk
ature. MS likes create additional features, which may be not contradicts, but not specified in original document. > > >I've got question about relationship between namespaces and Valid XML. > >... > >I didn't find clear explanations at w3c how this suppose to work >

Re: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-27 Thread Joseph_Kesselman
>I've got question about relationship between namespaces and Valid XML. >... >I didn't find clear explanations at w3c how this suppose to work Mostly because the W3C made no real effort to design namespaces so they "play well" with DTD validation. An assumption w

RE: namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-26 Thread Dean Roddey
IE is accepting this, it must be in error, or is not validating.   -- Dean Roddey Software Geek Extraordinaire Portal, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Boris Tarasyuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED

namespaces and Valid XML

2001-04-26 Thread Boris Tarasyuk
Hello I've got question about relationship between namespaces and Valid XML. This is example:    SAXparser.setDoValidation(true);   SAXparser.setDoNamespaces(true);   [    AT1 CDATA #IMPLIED > ]>       content text MS parser can read it. Xerces parses attribute