static build
Key: XERCESC-1340
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1340
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Bug
Versions: 2.6.0
Environment: linux fedora 3 gcc 3.4.2
Reporter: Lemaire Nicolas
Hello,
How i build statically xerces 2.6.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1340?page=history ]
Gareth Reakes closed XERCESC-1340:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hi, this is not a bug, but rather a question. Take a look in the archives or
aska question on the mailing list.
> static bui
Is there any more discussion on this topic? Are we ready to go to a
vote that we move forward on this direction/proposal?
Recommended sequence:
- A vote to ensure that we're in favor of moving toward a 3.0
release.
(on approval):
- Move repository to subversion
- Branch off a 2.
On 11 Feb 2005, at 20:11, James Berry wrote:
Anything else bold that needs to be done? Integral xpath support
anyone?
I would like to see this eventually. Maybe we can bring Pathan in. With
a full XPath engine we can borrow some ideas from the .net people.
Bringing Pathan in will be a lot of w
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1339?page=comments#action_59046 ]
Alberto Massari commented on XERCESC-1339:
--
Please give us more informations about the context in which you found this UMR;
either the XML file you were parsing,
At 21.01 11/02/2005 +, Gareth Reakes wrote:
On 11 Feb 2005, at 20:11, James Berry wrote:
Anything else bold that needs to be done? Integral xpath support anyone?
I would like to see this eventually. Maybe we can bring Pathan in. With a
full XPath engine we can borrow some ideas from the .net
Chris,
I just checked in a code revision that implements (2b). Could you
please review, when you get a chance, to see if this resolves the
problem you reported?
James.
On Jan 19, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Chris Cates wrote:
Hey James,
Thanks very much for the response. I'm definitely in favor of option
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1252?page=comments#action_59056 ]
Kean Johnston commented on XERCESC-1252:
The same problem appears with UnixWare, and for the same reasons. Both UnixWare
and MIPSPro use the EDG C++ front end. On
Hi James,
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/11/2005 03:11:26 PM:
> Is there any more discussion on this topic? Are we ready to go to a
> vote that we move forward on this direction/proposal?
>
> Recommended sequence:
>
> - A vote to ensure that we're in favor of moving toward a
