[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1347?page=history ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1347:
--
Resolution: Fixed
As suggested, I have removed the makefile from the BCB6 directory
Alberto
> Win32MsgLoader does not work with Borland
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have downloaded the Xerces C++ code and successfully compiled the
libraries, but what now? How do I create my schema compliant XML files?
You cannot in the same way as you use castor, but you can create it at
run time. Take a look at CreateDOMDocument for an example.
Hi Daniel,
The change resulting from this was to update the XSAnnotation that we store
to record the column and line number as well as the systemid of where the
annotation component was in the schema. There is not a feature to control
this behaviour (it happens automatically). The basic error che
Hi,
Many thanks for this. I will investigate.
However, do you happen to know if the Xerces support in XML Spy
Enterprise 2005, together with the Xerces parser itself, equates to the
'Castor' solution?
Regards
Philip
-Original Message-
From: Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi,
I have not used the enterprise edition, but my understanding was that
it is still a desktop tool for the creation of XML docs and schemas. I
did not think it had a programmatic API for you to integrate with. If it
does, I would be interested in hearing about it.
Cheers,
Gareth
[EMAIL PROTE
> Would you have anymore insight? (even if it was speculation).
When I ran it just to evaluate it, it was generating a set of C++ code that
interfaced with code they supplied as well as Xerces and I found the whole
thing inordinately convoluted.
But then, I think all data binding solutions are in
Hi,
I guess that this is my worry. If it created source code that could
seamlessly instantiate a DOM object that could be serialized, I would be
happier to go down this route, but if it is convoluted
Would your approach be to build the DOM from scratch then parse/validate
in memory, with the
> I guess that this is my worry. If it created source code that could
> seamlessly instantiate a DOM object that could be serialized, I would be
> happier to go down this route, but if it is convoluted
What I think is convoluted isn't necessarily for others, I'm just expressing
my opinion base
memory in reading XMLURL
Key: XERCESC-1362
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1362
Project: Xerces-C++
Type: Bug
Components: DOM
Versions: 2.5.0
Environment: redhat linux AS3.0,
bash-2.05b$ uname -a
Linux 2.4.21-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1362?page=comments#action_60163 ]
jesse commented on XERCESC-1362:
sorry, the title should be : Memory Leak in reading XMLURL
> memory in reading XMLURL
>
>
> Key: XERCESC
Hi,
Yes, I think that you are correct, it has no programmatic API (as far as
I know). However, it does have a manual code generator supporting Xerces
C++ so my thinking was that you could manually create the Xerces C++
compatible source code (C++ classes I might imagine?) from the
XML-Spy/Schemas,
11 matches
Mail list logo