v1.7.0 and VS.NET 2003

Reading the FAQ I guess the problem occurs because my app and xerces don't use the same runtime library anymore.Right? So, what are my choices to resolve this issue? 1. Upgrade xerces? To which version? 2. Build v1.7.0 with VS.NET? Don't have the project f

Re: v1.7.0 and VS.NET 2003

x27;ve used the binaries from xerces distribution but those are built using MSVC6 as I understand it. Right? Markus - Original Message - > Hi, > Markus wrote: > > 1. Upgrade xerces? To which version? > The latter one (2.5.0) is better :) > And use XMLString::release in

Re: On references to DOMElements

That works! Thanks! markus > Maybe you are looking for one of this: > void myFunc(DOMElement *& e1, DOMElement *& e2) { > e1 = doc->doSomethingThatReturnsPointerToElement(); > e2 = doc->doSomethingElseT

XMLString::transcode performance

call with constant arguments repeatedly, but shouldn't it still be equally fast every time? Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IDOM: increasing memory

ght, that the allocated memory for changed attributes will be deallocated only at deletion of the whole document? Is there any chance to get the memory of removed/changed attributes back without deleting the whole document? Thanks! markus +--+ |

xerces-c-dev-subscribe fellner@gimbio.de

xerces-c-dev-subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Difference between DOM and IDOM?

the value of an attribute many times the memory of the old value is not deallocated for reuse and the document grows and grows. The only change getting the memory back is the deletion of the overall document. Markus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Richard Bolen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

AW: Call for Vote: which one to be the Xerces-C++ public supported W3C DOM interface

If the memory management problem is solved, I prefer IDOM!!! -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Tinny Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Montag, 29. April 2002 17:08An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Call for Vote: which one to be the Xerces-C++ public supported W3C DOM interfa

AW: Call for Vote: which one to be the Xerces-C++ public supported W3C DOM interface

-ness!   Markus   -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Lenny Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Montag, 29. April 2002 17:57An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: RE: Call for Vote: which one to be the Xerces-C++ public supported W3C DOM interface Hi Markus,  

AW: Call for Vote: which one to be the Xerces-C++ public supported W3C DOM interface

_Element->getAttribute(...); ...   Sorry for my short answer. I go on holiday tomorrow  and i have to pack up!    I'm back in 2 weeks and looking forward to see the results of this voting. It's a pitty to go during a hot discussion on this list.   Markus -Ursprüngliche Nac

Creating and Writing DOM

_cl teststring=toString(theSerializer->writeToString(*doc)); std::cout.write((char *) teststring.c_str(), (int) teststring.size()); // works theSerializer->writeNode(myFormTarget, *doc); //doesn't work Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With best regards Markus Strauß Softwareentw

seg fault with XMLReaderFactory

e49c) at /usr/local/include/xercesc/sax2/XMLReaderFactory.hpp:113 #9 0x0804979a in AccessConfig::AccessConfig (this=0xbfffe588) at AccessConfig.cc:31 #10 0x0804a39a in main () at AccessConfig.cc:54 any ideas what is wrong here ? markus -- "Sie haben neue Mails!" - Die GMX Toolbar i

RE: seg fault with XMLReaderFactory

thanks a lot. now it works markus > Try: > > XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize(); > > cout << "0" << endl; > SAX2XMLReader* parser = XMLReaderFactory::createXMLReader(); > cout << "1" << endl; > > XMLPlatformUtils::Termi

include warnings with xerces

ectorOf.c:185: warning: declaration of `index' shadows global declaration - a colleague told me this is because the C header file string (that is in C++) is the reason. and the solution would be to include the xerces stuff first. but maybe the xerces itself uses any ideas how t

question

, double, etc.   Do you know if the Xerces parser has an option to deliver data in the types mentioned above, or if there is a way to transcode XMLCh in a way which is more efficient than atof, for example ?   Best regards,   Markus Haverkamp  

RE: question

Dear Gareth, Thanks, I will have a look. Best regards, Markus -Message d'origine- De : Gareth Reakes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 3 mai 2004 17:43 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: question Hi, > > more efficient than atof, for example ? No, and moreover,

v1.7.0 worth upgrading?

heavier or "fatter"? Do they perform worse than 1.7.0 speed-wise? What else you gurus have to say about pros and cons? TIA, Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

v1.7.0 worth upgrading?

heavier or "fatter"? Do they perform worse than 1.7.0 speed-wise? What else you gurus have to say about pros and cons? TIA, Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On references to DOMElements

mp; e2) { e1 = doc->doSomethingThatReturnsElement(); // compiler error e2 = *(doc->doSomethingThatReturnsElement());//compiler error here too } I'm on VS7.1. and Win2000. TIA, Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA

Problems installing Xerces-C on AIX.

Hi! I´ve installed Xerces-C, set the environment variables and run the configure-script on AIX 4.3. Now when I try to run make (gmake´s not installed) I get several errors (see down below). What´s the problem? Do I need gmake? Thanks /Markus Errors: utv01_utv1 >make "../Makefile.incl&q

XMLCH Doc

questions ...) Markus Volberg -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]