;
> the question may be stupid, but how do I create a doctype specification in
> a serialized document? Here's what I do, I'd expect to see a doctype
> declaration in the output, but I only get XML declaration and document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jochen
>
> publ
Hello,
the question may be stupid, but how do I create a doctype specification in
a serialized document? Here's what I do, I'd expect to see a doctype
declaration in the output, but I only get XML declaration and document.
Thanks,
Jochen
public class domtest {
public static
t; to me that ICU is open source.
>
> If you could tell me where you expect the exception to be caught I could
> look at my stack right before the exception is thrown...
>
> Thanks,
> Mike-
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
CTED]
Michael Burbidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/10/2000 11:58:36 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: DOCTYPE specification...
I took 1.0.1 and ported it to Machintosh. As a related issue, it would be
great to get my changes into the co
e the exception is thrown...
Thanks,
Mike-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 12:23:20 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: DOCTYPE specification...
>
>
>
>
> What version of the code are you using and what OS
ML4CExcepts" should be changed. That one must
have escaped the XML4C-->Xerces name changeover.
Mike
Michael Burbidge wrote:
>
> I have the following DOCTYPE specification:
>
>
>
> According to my understanding, this is a valid DOCTYPE specification, yet
> I'
scenarios?
Dean Roddey
Software Weenie
IBM Center for Java Technology - Silicon Valley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Burbidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/10/2000 09:26:52 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: DOCTYPE specification...
I have
At 10:26 AM 1/10/00 -0700, Jeff Lewis wrote:
>You should specify the protocol:
No.
is unconditionally just fine and should be handled correctly. Per
the relevant RFCs this is a "relative URI reference".
However.
In my experience, handling "file:" URIs (which is probably what
this turns out
:DOCTYPE specification...
I have the following DOCTYPE specification:
According to my understanding, this is a valid DOCTYPE
specification, yet
I'm failing when parsing the URL. The code throws a
XML4CEx
I have the following DOCTYPE specification:
According to my understanding, this is a valid DOCTYPE specification, yet
I'm failing when parsing the URL. The code throws a
XML4CExcepts::URL_MalformedURL exception. When I traced through the code I
found that the method URL::findType was lo
10 matches
Mail list logo
