ssage-
From: Ted Leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2000 5:30 PM
To: George T. Joseph
Subject: Re: One more...Changes for XMLParser.java
- Original Message -
From: "George T. Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Leung" <[EMAIL PROT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: One more...Changes for XMLParser.java
I've applied the other two patches and committed them.
I'm going to reject this one. It doesn't conform to any Schema
Working Drafts. I'm semi open to being convinced to the contrary
patch to correctly apply your
patches. Could you try context diffs next time? Maybe Cygwin
would like those better.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: "George T. Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "xerces-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 12:00 AM
This one is definitely in the "use at your own risk" category. I needed the
capability for an XML document to be validated from a
Schema AND include short fragments. Currently you can have a DOCTYPE with an
internal DTD and ENTITY definitions OR you can
validate from a Schema, but not both. I
