Ah, I see. You're just changing the visibility of the classes. The
vtable layout doesn't change (I misread the code -- sorry!).
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Now, who said they were incompatible?? All we're doing is exposing some
> additional symbols to allow debugging. This are just dec
It should use XML_DEBUG, not _DEBUG, which is VC++ specific. Each compiler
gets to look at its own debug on/off setting and is supposed to turn on
XML_DEBUG if the compiler specific one is on. This lets us have debug only
code that is not dependent upon any particular compiler scheme. But,
other
Now, who said they were incompatible?? All we're doing is exposing some
additional symbols to allow debugging. This are just declarations, no
executable code, no change in object layouts, vtables, inlines, etc. We
just need to get this stuff seen by the modules that use DOMString.hpp so
the deb
Ooooh. A Debug build that's binary incompatible with the Release
version of the same build. This sounds like a dangerous idea to me.
Alarm bells are going off in my head (or maybe I forgot to take my
Prozac today? :-)
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Here it is, conditionalized, so release b
