> Jason, do you have any numbers/stats as to whether parsing into JDOM using
> SAX is faster than a typical DOM parse in, say, Xerces?
Sorry, I've not done comparison timings recently. Nor has anyone spent
dedicated time improving performance yet.
But if you do testing, make sure to use the la
> Angus Rose wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> first things first, what is this SOAP business,is it
> good? Also has anybody played with electric xml? I see the uRL at the
> bottom of this page and was wondering what peoples reactions were to
> it - espec. as it supports XPATH - how do you i
Glen Daniels wrote:
>
> * One feature of the SOAP section 5 encoding is "multi-ref
> accessors", which work like this:
It is worth noting that section 5 is optional (though likely high used).
Within that option, there are a number of people who consider multi-ref
accessors to be a low use case (si
Gladiator
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/utils
XMLUtils.java
>
> Hi Sam!
>
> I agree with th
Glen Daniels wrote:
>
> OK, here's my suggestion. Take it with appropriate salt.
>
> DOM is pretty much a pain in the ass to work with, and we're Java
> developers, with access to JDOM. JDOM is screaming along in terms of
> functionality, and they now deal just fine with JAXP on the bottom end, s
