Kevin Vogt wrote:
> I am most interested in the compatibility of these three products
> with the
> Java API. As the table shows, I do not know the lowest version(s) of
> the
> Java API that can use Xerces 1.4.3 or Xerces 2.0.0. Does anybody out
> there
> know where that is documented, or what the a
I'm comparing Crimson, Xerces 1.4.3 and Xerces 2.0.0 beta 3.
I've searched...
* the Crimson, Xerces1 and Xerces2 FAQs
* Sun's JAXP site
* xerces-j-dev
* xerces-j-user
* xerces-p-dev
* xml-apache-announce
* xml-apache-general
* comp.text.xml group archive on Google
Here's what I've come up with so
Hi,
I am new to this SAX2 business. So, I ran into a very
basic problem, to most people. That is, after I set
up the system property "org.xml.sax.driver" to
"org.apache.xerces.parsers.SAXParser" and tried to use
the following line:
"XMLReader xr=XMLReaderFactory.createXMLReader()", the
followi
Hi All,
I have a xml file (short snippet as shown below)
Books Set 1
...
.
1
2
Hi
I apologise for the length of this schema, I have tried to reproduce this
error in a simpler way but with no success. I have included the whole files.
using Xerces 1.4.3 i am getting the following errors
[Error] dictionary.xml:10:25: Duplicate unique value [ID Value: hello1]
declared for ide
Title: RE: parser looks for DTD file even if validation is off
Hi!
Can any one help me in defining a dtd, which
enforces that attributes in the tag can be in any order
which mean dtd should not enforce the order for
name, value, pattern i.e a rule of kind
is also valid
Any pointers
this is the first set
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
targetNamespace="urn:myschema">
2001-01-10
Ok, I think I am beginning to understand. Thank you for your help.
Colin
p.s. Why can't the w3c make their specs readable to mere mortals?
-Origi
> From: Colin Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Then that means that that is not the solution, since in the instance doc
> is not qualified with a prefix. Unless the fact that there is no
> prefix defined for the namespace, implies that elements with no prefix are
> qualified? That could explain why
Then that means that that is not the solution, since in the instance doc
is not qualified with a prefix. Unless the fact that there is no
prefix defined for the namespace, implies that elements with no prefix are
qualified? That could explain why it would work with the attribute set to
"qualified"
> From: Colin Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> someone just told me how to fix... elementFormDefault="qualified"...I'm not
> entirely sure what this does, but I intend to find out.
If you set elementFormDefault as qualified, it means that in the instance doc.,
all the elements (global + local) sho
someone just told me how to fix... elementFormDefault="qualified"...I'm not
entirely sure what this does, but I intend to find out.
Thanks for your help
Colin
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 November 2001 06:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
I have tried. using external-schemaLocation. Note that it hasn't complained
about the gift element being "not declared", and is "aware" that the
contents of gift should be "birthday". Based on that I am assuming that it
has found the schema
-Original Message-
From: Rahul Srivastava [mailto
> From: Colin Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I can't figure out what is wrong with this schema, can someone please help
> (Xerces 1.4.3)
>
> [Error] result.xml:3:12: Element type "birthday" must be declared.
> [Error] result.xml:4:9: The content of element type "gift" must match
> "(birthday)".
>
I can't figure out what is wrong with this schema, can someone please help
(Xerces 1.4.3)
[Error] result.xml:3:12: Element type "birthday" must be declared.
[Error] result.xml:4:9: The content of element type "gift" must match
"(birthday)".
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
targetNamespace="urn:
14 matches
Mail list logo