Perfect! Thanks, Ulrike.
I'll send a message to the maintainer.
Lasse
Am 30.08.2011 um 23:30 schrieb xetex-requ...@tug.org:
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:07:07 +0200
From: Ulrike Fischer ne...@nililand.de
To: xetex@tug.org
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] xunicode combining ring above
Message-ID:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 23:30, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Do we need three Unicode TeXs? (The third one is pTeX.)
http://en.sourceforge.jp/projects/luatex-ja/
The idea behind the project is to make a pTeX replacement.
Mojca
--
Subscriptions,
Am 31.08.2011 um 12:02 schrieb Keith J. Schultz:
Nothing is considered stable just yet.
The same would be true when you try to port XeTeX from ATSUI to CoreText.
In other words, xe(la)tex would be the way to go. For awhile.
And therefore keep old versions of Mac OS X! Leopard and Snow
On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:30, Peter Dyballa wrote:
In other words, xe(la)tex would be the way to go. For awhile.
And therefore keep old versions of Mac OS X! Leopard and Snow Leopard are OK
(it depends on the hardware it will run on: Mac OS X must be younger than the
hardware or it won't run
On Aug 31, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:30, Peter Dyballa wrote:
In other words, xe(la)tex would be the way to go. For awhile.
And therefore keep old versions of Mac OS X! Leopard and Snow Leopard are OK
(it depends on the hardware it will run on: Mac OS
Folks,
I read lots of messages on the XeTeX and TeX on OS X mailing lists
of the form I'm in the middle of a project using XeTeX; how do I do ….? This,
plus
information from personal contacts, convinces me that XeTeX is heavily
used by people with real work to be done.
XeTeX runs fine on Lion,
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 17:47, Richard Koch wrote:
Having said all of that, it would be wonderful if someone would take on the
task of converting the Macintosh portions of XeTeX from ATSUI to Core Text,
since it would remove the worry that Apple (at some distant time) would
remove the 32 bit
Am 31.08.2011 um 16:50 schrieb Jonathan Kew:
Why, is there a problem with running the current (Intel build of) xetex on
10.7? I wasn't aware of this.
And neither me. Because I'm not using Lion (Mac OS X 10.7).
Seems like you're introducing unnecessary complication and confusion
It's
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Richard Koch k...@math.uoregon.edu wrote:
Folks,
I read lots of messages on the XeTeX and TeX on OS X mailing lists
of the form I'm in the middle of a project using XeTeX; how do I do ….?
This, plus
information from personal contacts, convinces me that
Hello!
Am 30.08.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
…
The recent XeTeX versions in TeX Live 2010 and 2011 *are* micro-type enabled.
…
when I use TexLive 2011 with a generic XeLaTeX template with
\usepackage{microtype} I get the following log:
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.3-0.9997.5
On Aug 31, 2011, at 1:42 PM, Rolf Schmolling wrote:
Hello!
Am 30.08.2011 um 15:00 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
…
The recent XeTeX versions in TeX Live 2010 and 2011 *are* micro-type enabled.
…
when I use TexLive 2011 with a generic XeLaTeX template with
\usepackage{microtype} I get the
Am 31.08.2011 um 20:42 schrieb Rolf Schmolling:
So what to do?
As Herb mentioned: you need to download and install the experimental
microtype package from the TLcontrib site. Tlmgr on all platforms and TLU (TeX
Live Utility) on modern Mac OS X platforms (Snow Leopard, Lion) can perform
this
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:52:43PM +0200, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 31.08.2011 um 16:50 schrieb Jonathan Kew:
Why, is there a problem with running the current (Intel build of) xetex on
10.7? I wasn't aware of this.
And neither me. Because I'm not using Lion (Mac OS X 10.7).
Seems like
Hi Arthur,
On 01/09/2011, at 9:29 AM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
It's always better to prepare when you can instead of trying when you can't.
So you're backing your random statements by equally random sayings?
On a related note, are you aware that you should never talk to a llama
wearing
14 matches
Mail list logo
