On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 16:01, Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
Le 31/10/2011 19:47, Alessandro Ceschini a écrit :
Hi
My problem is kind of complicated:
1. After processing a XeLaTeX source file the yellow lines the
cross-reference between pdf and source file and vice versa is completely
broken.
Hi
To Mojca:
No, the version I'm running is NOT the one bundled with Ubuntu 11.10
(that's TL 2009), I just downloaded a dvd of TL 2011 and installed it
manually via tl-install. Installation is complete (every package), and
nothing of the TL 2009 package bundled with Ubuntu is installed. I
So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was
using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I
upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010
on my hard disk).
I do not think there has been major changes in XeTeX
On Nov 7, 2011, at 5:28 AM, Vafa Khalighi wrote:
So, are you suggesting I should downgrade to TL 2010? Previously I was
using just that version, without any apparent problem, all started when I
upgraded to TL 2011 (but after a fresh install, so no remnants of TL 2010
on my hard disk).
Hi
To Vafa:
I uploaded a minimal working example, it's a stripped down version of a
book, text removed apart from a stub using greek text (Unicode
capabilities), the prologue is intact, the default font is Tinos, a
freely downloadable font, but if you want you can substitute it with
I uploaded a minimal working example, it's a stripped down version of a
book, text removed apart from a stub using greek text (Unicode
capabilities), the prologue is intact, the default font is Tinos, a freely
downloadable font, but if you want you can substitute it with
LiberationSerif or any
On Nov 5, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Karljurgen Feuerherm wrote:
It is true, of course, that one may *not* want B5 pdf when the page is
B5 (say to allow for trim), so forcing the two to be identical wouldn't
be the thing to do either...
Correct.
I've posted code for handling this here --- you also
Hi
To Vafa:
Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your
\usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and
no, I didn't get it back in TexLive 2010.
Have you also noticed something like this in your output console?
Thanks--I'll keep this on file!
K
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 7:43 AM, in message
502af2c0-e9fe-4ca8-98f2-28e037706...@frycomm.com, William Adams
will.ad...@frycomm.com wrote:
On Nov 5, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Karljurgen Feuerherm wrote:
It is true, of course, that one may *not* want B5 pdf when the
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Alessandro Ceschini
alessandroceschini...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
To Vafa:
Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif Italic, just look in your
\usr\share\fonts directory, it's not normal to get such an error, and no, I
didn't get it back in TexLive 2010.
Right.
Hi,
my Liberation Serif (from CentOS 5) contains italic but not greek. I
processed the file by TL 2009, 2010, 2011, the results are at
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/stripped-down/
2011/11/7 Alessandro Ceschini alessandroceschini...@gmail.com:
Hi
To Vafa:
Wait, there exists a Liberation Serif
Hi guys,
Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first
place? I just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort
stuff, not first-choice. So why loading a slanted shape when the italic
is available?
I will take a look at your output files, but the real issues
2011/11/7 Alessandro Ceschini alessandroceschini...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place? I
At my computer Liberation Serif Italic (and Bold Italic) is found and used.
just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are a last-resort stuff,
I can't help with the original problem, but I would like to comment on a
question that came up as an aside:
Quoting Alessandro Ceschini (alessandroceschini...@gmail.com):
Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first
place? I just don't understand why! Slanted shapes are
Am 07.11.2011 um 12:50 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:
I uploaded a minimal working example
Slanted text font can be made like this with fontspec:
\newfontface\slanted[RawFeature={slant=0.194}]{Lucida Bright}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\textsl}[1]{{\slanted #1}}
--
Greetings
Pete
Klingons do
On Monday 07 November 2011 06:24 PM, Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
To Chandra
The reality is I just don't subscribe to the mailing list in order to
avoid getting my box flooded with issues I don't bother with, I just
answer by clicking on the address at tug.org/pipemail/xetex etc... I
understand
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 08:48, Alessandro Ceschini
alessandroceschini...@gmail.com wrote:
Why should fontspec try to load a crappy slanted shape in the first place?
Slanted =/= crappy. You have have optically adjusted obliques for sans
serif typefaces. You can even have slanted serif fonts.
Hello Wagner,
Is there anything wrong with the attached .map file?
2011/11/3 Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com
2011/11/4 Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de:
Am 04.11.2011 um 01:13 schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
2011/11/4 Peter Dyballa peter_dyba...@web.de:
Am 03.11.2011 um 23:53
Hi everybody
Chadra, I took a look at your log file and you get this:
LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/sl' undefined
(Font) using `EU1/LiberationSerif(0)/m/n' instead on input line 44
But no fontspec error related to Greek, actually the output is positive:
Am 07.11.2011 um 13:54 schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:
That too is new for me, it's a fake error since Greek letters are correctly
displayed and Tinos DOES contain Greek letters. So, what's wrong with
fontspec?
The existence of (some) Greek letters does not preclude the font's support for
To Peter:
Hi
Those warnings appear with practically every stuff that involves Unicode
or Opentype issues, from polytonic Greek to ligatures, to localized
glyphs, everything revolving around fontspec with whichever font, gives
me such warnings.
Greetings
--
/Alessandro Ceschini/
Hi Alessandro,
On 07/11/2011, at 10:14 PM, Alessandro Ceschini wrote:
Hi
To Mojca:
No, the version I'm running is NOT the one bundled with Ubuntu 11.10 (that's
TL 2009), I just downloaded a dvd of TL 2011 and installed it manually via
tl-install. Installation is complete (every
Am 07.11.2011 um 23:31 schrieb Ross Moore:
(and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him)
Ross,
do you mean Mojca with him? (I'm confident she is still a woman. In which
case a her would be appropriate. But I also wonder why Mail chose this
signature…)
--
Greetings
Pete
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:31, Ross Moore wrote:
But Ubuntu probably just took the released version and not the branch
with fixes. Also, unless I'm mistaken, I'm not aware of official TL
distribution shipping patched binaries either and I don't exactly
understand why since the mechanism to
Hi Peter,
On 08/11/2011, at 9:50 AM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 07.11.2011 um 23:31 schrieb Ross Moore:
(and apologies to Mojca if I've just mis-represented him)
Ross,
do you mean Mojca with him? (I'm confident she is still a woman. In which
case a her would be appropriate.
Ooops. My
25 matches
Mail list logo