Thank you for valuable suggestions.
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: xetex-boun...@tug.org [mailto:xetex-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Zdenek
Wagner
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:24 PM
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Difference between
Hi All,
Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between XeLaTeX
and LaTeX typesettings?
Thanks,
Suresh
This email and any accompanying attachments is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized
2011/9/21 Suresh Avvarulakshmi, Integra-PDY, IN
suresh.avvarulaks...@integra.co.in:
Hi All,
Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between
XeLaTeX and LaTeX typesettings?
I do not know but it can be said quite simply. In any case, it is
Lamport's LaTeX with
2. XeLaTeX cannot use microtypographical extensions but it may change
in the future. Currently pdflatex or lualatex is needed.
Actually there are already experimental versions of XeTeX lying around
that have some microtypographical features, see:
http://xetex.tk/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
suresh.avvarulaks...@integra.co.in:
Hi All,
Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between
XeLaTeX and LaTeX typesettings?
There can't be any. Both pass the TRIP test.
--
Greetings
Pete
The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for «
