On May 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, C Y wrote:
If I manage to come up with something functional, would a poppler-removing
patch be of interest?
I would certainly vote for it as would everyone else interested in kertex or
using TeX on a server.
William
--
William Adams
senior graphic designer
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 07:43:43AM -0400, William Adams wrote:
On May 18, 2012, at 11:59 AM, C Y wrote:
If I manage to come up with something functional, would a
poppler-removing patch be of interest?
I would certainly vote for it as would everyone else interested in
kertex or using TeX
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:49:46PM -0700, C Y wrote:
XeTeX is not MIT but GPL. It uses a GPL library (poppler), so...
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3304292group_id=194926atid=951385
That affects only the resulting binary, XeTeX code is still MIT licensed
(unless
From: Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org
Poppler is used to read PDF files (for inclusion) not to write them.
Regards,
Khaled
Ah, good to know. So something more like PoDoFo or QPDF would be needed.
If I manage to come up with something functional, would a poppler-removing
patch be of
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:59 PM, C Y wrote:
If I manage to come up with something functional, would a poppler-removing
patch be of interest?
I might be wrong, but I think that currently a much more awaited patch
would be one replacing ATSUI library calls with Core Text. I guess
that would be
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:59 PM, C Y wrote:
If I manage to come up with something functional, would a poppler-removing
patch be of interest?
See:
http://meeting.contextgarden.net/2008/talks/2008-08-22-martin-pdflib/handout.pdf
(and I'm almost sure that there must be newer slides by
2012/5/17 C Y smustude...@yahoo.com:
From: Joseph Wright joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk
Oh yes, license and library issues: I forgot :-)
Does KerTeX have license issues? (XeTeX being MIT instead of GPL was one of
the things that drew me to it, actually...)
XeTeX is not MIT but GPL. It
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 01:34:47PM +0200, Martin Schröder wrote:
2012/5/17 C Y smustude...@yahoo.com:
From: Joseph Wright joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk
Oh yes, license and library issues: I forgot :-)
Does KerTeX have license issues? (XeTeX being MIT instead of GPL was one
of the
XeTeX is not MIT but GPL. It uses a GPL library (poppler), so...
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3304292group_id=194926atid=951385
That affects only the resulting binary, XeTeX code is still MIT licensed
(unless pdfimage.cpp is *copying* code from poppler), AFAIK.
Has anyone
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the build
appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal) TeX
once compilation is complete? (It didn't seem to in my quick test, but it's
quite possible I didn't do
On 16/05/2012 05:38, C Y wrote:
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the
build appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal) TeX
once compilation is complete? (It didn't seem to in my quick test,
On May 15, 2012, at 11:38 PM, C Y wrote:
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the
build appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal) TeX
once compilation is complete? (It didn't seem to in my
2012/5/16 C Y smustude...@yahoo.com:
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the
build appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal)
TeX once compilation is complete? (It didn't seem to in my quick
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:38 AM, C Y smustude...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the
build appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal)
TeX once compilation is complete? (It
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 6:38 AM, C Y wrote:
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the
build appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal)
TeX once compilation is complete? (It didn't seem to in my
On Tue, 15 May 2012, C Y wrote:
environment wise...) If not, is there documentation anywhere of what
constitutes the minimal set of files that will allow an average LaTeX
document to be typeset?
That is a lot like asking for the minimal set of files that will allow an
average Linux software
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 04:42:31PM +0100, Joseph Wright wrote:
On 16/05/2012 05:38, C Y wrote:
I have compiled xetex from the latest Git sources on sourceforge, and the
build appears to have been successful.
Does the sourceforge Git repo of xetex produce a working (albeit minimal)
On 16/05/2012 17:18, Khaled Hosny wrote:
TeX is more than one program, so it's not as simple as grabbing 'source
for the binary nameTeX' and compiling it.
For a minimal compilable set up, maybe take a look at KerTeX:
http://www.kergis.com/en/kertex.html
Which does not include XeTeX :)
Oh
From: Joseph Wright joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk
For a minimal compilable set up, maybe take a look at KerTeX:
http://www.kergis.com/en/kertex.html
Thanks - I hadn't heard of KerTeX. That looks quite interesting...
From: Herbert Schulz he...@wideopenwest.com
If you happen to be on a
From: Joseph Wright joseph.wri...@morningstar2.co.uk
Oh yes, license and library issues: I forgot :-)
Does KerTeX have license issues? (XeTeX being MIT instead of GPL was one of
the things that drew me to it, actually...)
Cheers,
CY
--
Does KerTeX have license issues? (XeTeX being MIT instead of GPL was one of
the things that drew me to it, actually...)
Oh, nevermind - I see it now, an advertising clause.
CY
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
21 matches
Mail list logo
