Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-21 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
Dear Mr. Duffner, Thank you very much for your cooperation: since you're a seasoned expert of that issue, my I suggest you get involved in the Liberation fonts: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009650 where they're experiencing more or less the same problem? Best wishes, --

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-18 Thread Georg Duffner
Am 17.09.2013 16:55, schrieb Alessandro Ceschini: Hello Ross, I attached the whole output, not just the pdf, in the even that you wish to check the .tex file as well. I've also attached the output, that is the pasted text from the .pdf as it appears on LO. The font is always the same,

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-18 Thread Zdenek Wagner
2013/9/18 Georg Duffner g.duff...@gmail.com: Am 17.09.2013 16:55, schrieb Alessandro Ceschini: Hello Ross, I attached the whole output, not just the pdf, in the even that you wish to check the .tex file as well. I've also attached the output, that is the pasted text from the .pdf as it

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-18 Thread Georg A. Duffner
Steve White does know of that kind of inconsistency throughout the fonts. We've discussed it among others in http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?38810 Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com schrieb: 2013/9/18 Georg Duffner g.duff...@gmail.com: Am 17.09.2013 16:55, schrieb Alessandro Ceschini:

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-18 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
Hello everybody, This is indeed the latest version from SVN. However, even glyphs with correct names' fail to be copied correctly, as you can see: so, maybe this is not the real issue. Regards, -- /Alessandro Ceschini/ -- Subscriptions,

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-17 Thread Steve White
Hi Alessandro, Let me clarify a bit. The current standards for text encoding, Unicode, does not distinguish the Serbian Cyrillic glyphs -- they are regarded as a style. A stylistic substitution of glyphs can be specified, as you pointed out, by an OpenType font. PDF typically contains glyphs

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-17 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
Hello Ross, I attached the whole output, not just the pdf, in the even that you wish to check the .tex file as well. I've also attached the output, that is the pasted text from the .pdf as it appears on LO. The font is always the same, FreeSerif, bundled with Ubuntu. Regards, -- /Alessandro

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-17 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
Hello Ross, I attached the whole output, not just the pdf, in the even that you wish to check the .tex file as well. I've also attached the output, that is the pasted text from the .pdf as it appears on LO. The font is always the same, FreeSerif, bundled with Ubuntu. Regards, -- /Alessandro

[XeTeX] XeLaTeX PDF Glitch with Serbian Glyphs

2013-09-16 Thread Alessandro Ceschini
Serbian Cyrillic requires a peculiar localisation because some glyphs are different from the standard. The PDF produced by XeLaTeX however must have some glitch because if I try copy/paste from it to another document the characters affected by Serbian localisation simply disappear :-\ ! This