Hi!
I use texlive/2009; TexShop 2.33; and 10.4.11.
I am also now using a font called Junicode (http://junicode.sourceforge.net).
When the accented character ṛ (-r- with an underdot) is input within
\section{}, a box appears in the pdf rather than the character.
At the same time, however, this
On 26/04/2010 16:49, TIMOTHY P. LIGHTHISER wrote:
Hi!
I use texlive/2009; TexShop 2.33; and 10.4.11.
I am also now using a font called Junicode (http://junicode.sourceforge.net).
When the accented character ṛ (-r- with an underdot) is input within
\section{}, a box appears in the pdf rather
This is because Junicode does not have precisely the same character set
in all faces. Your heading is looking for bold, and U+1E5B is not
present in bold. As I don't have as much time as I'd like to sync all
the faces, I deal with these issues as they come up. If you like, I'll
add this glyph
TIMOTHY P. LIGHTHISER tlighthi...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi!
I use texlive/2009; TexShop 2.33; and 10.4.11.
I am also now using a font called Junicode (http://junicode.sourceforge.net).
When the accented character ṛ (-r- with an underdot) is input within
\section{}, a box appears in the pdf
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:11:52PM -0400, Peter Baker wrote:
This is because Junicode does not have precisely the same character
set in all faces.
That is one reason I personally think combining marks + ccmp are better
than pre-composed glyphs, the less glyph work the easier to sync fonts.
Sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TIMOTHY P. LIGHTHISER wrote:
Hi!
I use texlive/2009; TexShop 2.33; and 10.4.11.
I am also now using a font called Junicode (http://junicode.sourceforge.net).
When the accented character ṛ (-r- with an underdot) is input within
\section{}, a
I have a double `diacritics' (that is an Umlaut with an accent on top of
it) problem with Chinese, and the following works for me:
\newcommand\zhtone[2]{% % Usage \zhtone{\u}{ü}
{\fontencoding{OT1}\selectfont
#1{\fontencoding{EU1}\selectfont #2}}}
So, does
On 4/26/10 12:44 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
That is one reason I personally think combining marks + ccmp are better
than pre-composed glyphs, the less glyph work the easier to sync fonts.
Sure it means a bit extra OpenType work, but this can easily be shared
between faces.
Regards,
Khaled
On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:11:52PM -0400, Peter Baker wrote:
This is because Junicode does not have precisely the same character
set in all faces.
That is one reason I personally think combining marks + ccmp are better
than pre-composed
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16:46PM -0400, Peter Baker wrote:
On 4/26/10 12:44 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
That is one reason I personally think combining marks + ccmp are better
than pre-composed glyphs, the less glyph work the easier to sync fonts.
Sure it means a bit extra OpenType work, but
| I use texlive/2009; TexShop 2.33; and 10.4.11.
| I am also now using a font called Junicode (http://junicode.sourceforge.net).
| When the accented character ṛ (-r- with an underdot) is input within
| \section{}, a box appears in the pdf rather than the character.
| []
| A minimal example is
11 matches
Mail list logo
