George -
Thanks!
- Doug McK.
From: "George N. White III"
To: "xetex"
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2021 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Guaranteed Unicode replacement glyph in every TeX
installation?
On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 22:46, Doug McKenna < [ mailto:d...@ma
ixed-width
OpenType/TrueType font distributed with TeXLive that would work?
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
- Original Message -
From: "news3"
To: "xetex"
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 10:39:25 AM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Guaranteed Unicode replacement glyph in every T
s the case.
All I want is for the computer-generated LaTeX file "to just work" out of the
box (so to speak), so that a naive user isn't faced with an error message the
first time they typeset it with something like TeXShop.
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
or TeXLive or whatever that one can rely upon
to be available for placing this particular glyph in a final PDF file? What
would be the correct incantation to doing so?
Thanks.
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
ts for extended
>| TeX features in the draft ltnews31 which will be part of next week's
>| latex-dev release, but you can see the sources now at
>|
>| Primitive Requirements:
>| https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/develop/base/doc/ltnews31.tex#L596
>|
>| see also
>|
>| Improved load-times for expl3:
>| https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/blob/develop/base/doc/ltnews31.tex#L169
>|
>| on the additional items preloaded in the format.
Many thanks! This is very helpful.
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
tables twice,
especially when the second time (reading this file) rather inefficiently takes
30 times longer than the first, and accomplishes nothing new.
Thanks for thinking about my questions, I appreciate it.
Doug McKenna
s of TeX code added to the file appears to me to solve the
problem, with no downside to creating the XeTeX LaTeX format.
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
ny downsides to this minor change that I'm missing? Is there a
better name for the primitive? What can I do to encourage that the above test
be officially added to "load-unicode-data.tex"?
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
t is a proper legal value for a ? Alternatively, should be changed in this documentation to something less ambiguous, such as
or or ?
Doug McKenna
Mathemaesthetics, Inc.
is negligible,
though I don't really know.
- Doug McKenna
combining marks (Unicode 'M') should be entered into
\Umathcode as TeX class 7; if the latter, then presumably not, though it's not
clear why a math variable name can't have a combining mark.
- Doug McKenna
installed
in \lccode and/or \uccode?
Also, there's a confusing typo ("can"?) in
- \lccode and \uccode for all of class "Lt" (title
case letters) to the lower can upper case mappings
(or if not given to the code point itself)
Should "can' be "and/or"?
Doug McKenna
, I'm not
sure without looking at its code.
Doug McKenna
From: "Ross Moore"
To: "xetex"
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 5:16:44 PM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Math class initialization in Unicde-aware engine
Hi Joe, Doug
On 28 Nov 2019, at 10:27 am, Joseph Wright <
zation of a
Unicode-aware engine, yet the comments in load-unicode-math-classes.tex don't
say one way or the other, and it appears to me that the parsing code is
ignoring it.
The ReadMe.md file
<https://ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/generic/unicode-data>
is also deficient in answering this question.
TIA,
Doug McKenna
Is xgreek.sty loaded as part of creating the LaTeX format? If not, my
understanding is that its corrections wouldn't affect any of the hyphenation
patterns installed from xetex.ini during the format build.
Perhaps this doesn't matter.
- Doug McKenna
- Original Message -
From: "
X
source code to do it.
But there are a whole lot of lowercase letters in Unicode, so I'm wondering how
XeTeX determines legal lowercase letters for initial pattern files?
I've tried looking at some version of the xetex.web code, but without
illumination, I'm afraid.
TIA,
Doug McKenna
nd in the arithmetic.
FWIW,
Doug McKenna
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Mukunda Pasedach" <peter.pased...@googlemail.com>
To: "XeTeX (Unicode-based TeX) discussion." <xetex@tug.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 9:13:08 AM
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Hyp
the font can't
know the threshold height at which to stop construction. The former
means hard coding internal glyph IDs somewhere outside the font, which
I'm hoping is not fragile, but worrying might be.
Sorry for the reams of details, but I'm trying to be explain my confusion
exactly.
Doug
18 matches
Mail list logo