Hi,
I am in Rishikesh to specifically talk to Omkarananda Ashrama regarding the
same. Having had the discussion with the Swamiji previously he is definitely
open for it if it will help improve the font.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 19-Jun-2017, at 5:46 PM, ShreeDevi Kumar
I've installed the new TeXLive 2017. There is a conflict between the
metalogo and bidi packages. I don't suppose this would be a biggie,
except that the xltxtra package loads metalogo. (And something else I'm
using loads xltxtra...)
The conflict is shown in this minimal example:
--
Hi Adam,
On Jun 20, 2017, at 8:10 AM, maxwell
> wrote:
I've installed the new TeXLive 2017. There is a conflict between the metalogo
and bidi packages. I don't suppose this would be a biggie, except that the
xltxtra package loads
2017-06-19 1:16 GMT+02:00 Christian Boitet :
> Hi, 18/6/17
>
> Marathi (script) is surely not a subset ofHindi (script) as, for example,
> there are 2 letters "L" in Marathi and 1 only in Hindi.
>
You are right. I forgot Salman Khan who has this second L in his name.
>
I should add one more note. Indian languages are complex, the same word may
have two or more orthographies and all of them are correct. Even Hindi has
two forms in Devanagari, हिंदी and हिन्दी, both are found with more or less
the same frequency. There are two forms of independent A, both are in
Hi all,
@Christian Boitet- you are right. Marathi characters are not subsets of the
Hindi ones.
Firstly, Marathi has two L s unlike Hindi, ल and ळ. On InScript keyboard,
the second one is considered as "harsh" L, in the sense that it is obtained
by "Shift+ल'.
This harsh L appears in Vedic
Going back to the original message:
>On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Vikram Iyer
wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am writing this as I am collaborating with a
> typography expert to create a better version of Sanskrit 2003 free for all
> with support