on alpha.gnu.org.
--
Kelledin
If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still
cost four figures to fix?
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, put the #undef bool at the end, as
it was in 5.3)
--
Kelledin
If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still
cost four figures to fix?
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
make the case there.
If we decide to go that route, we'd also have to make sure the
relevant parts of XFree86 compile with gcc -ansi. Then this
problem might go away entirely, except for not-so-recent gcc
compilers.
--
Kelledin
If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does
On Thursday 19 February 2004 06:07 pm, Kelledin wrote:
We might possibly have gcc skip the offending stdbool.h
contents whenever __STRICT_ANSI__ is defined. I would
consider that fairly proper myself, as this is exactly what
gcc -ansi is supposed to address. I'll run off to the gcc
devs
) for the current 4.3.0 branch,
and implement (3) for 4.4.0 or some later release where a driver
API break is marginally acceptable. Anything besides (3) should
just be treated as a temporary stopgap measure, as otherwise
we'd just be digging ourselves deeper into the same hole.
--
Kelledin
5 matches
Mail list logo