Hi All,
I just checked Clipper PCODE, and it seems we were wrong. Clipper does NOT
optimize Upper(), NOR Chr(), I wonder how/why we concluded they are
optimized - anyone remember?
At the absence of any correction to my observation, I'd like to simply
comment out the above optimizations, and
Ron
in my opinion we should release now, but i also suggest to some one talk to
Budjanto about updating gtwvw or even phil
Regards
Luiz
--
___
xHarbour-developers mailing
Ron
Anyone aware of any SHOW STOPPER, or would like to post any other commit?
__TracePrgCalls( .t. ) has stopped working
For us it has been helpful finding problems.
Regards,
--
Luis Krause Mantilla
lkrausem at shaw dot ca
luis_krause at hotmail dot com
May the Source be with GNU
Ron:
It seems my email is choppy. I sent this msg but didn't make it to the
list:
I found the answer. Miguel changed the previous default logic:
2009-01-28 16:46 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet miguelan...@marchuet.net
* include\hbsetup.h
+ added HB_NO_TRACE as default, when trace will be
Ye has little overhead, but by default terminal aplications don't need it.
TRACE is a good tool for developers, but not for released.
I personally prefer not overhead by default the compiler.
Best regards,
Miguel Angel Marchuet
Luis Krause Mantilla escribió:
Ron:
It seems my email is
For me we are now prepared to release, we are enough stable.
I only has one bad notice, rddads doesn't works, almost I can use
anymore at ourxdbu, for example.
any body has some news about it ?
I hope to release to finish work at NUL item flag support and
ansi/oem/utf8/wide/... items support
Miguel:
Can you elaborate on the rddads problem?
Here we only use ADS and works just fine.
Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
For me we are now prepared to release, we are enough stable.
I only has one bad notice, rddads doesn't works, almost I can use
anymore at ourxdbu, for example.
any body
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Ron Pinkas ron.pin...@xharbour.com wrote:
Hi All,
I just checked Clipper PCODE, and it seems we were wrong. Clipper does NOT
optimize Upper(), NOR Chr(), I wonder how/why we concluded they are
optimized - anyone remember?
At the absence of any
8 matches
Mail list logo