I'm agree.

Is absurd to make changes of this magnitude because it involves many hours of 
work for others.

And in this case the change is not always justified in any case. ( the massive 
use of const, or add unused var to structures for 
all compilers)

I think that in such cases, if there really is a substantial improvement, it is 
best to create
a new version of the engine RDD and both can coexist.

As the majority of compilers on the market.


Phil Krylov escribió:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Luiz Rafael Culik
> Guimaraes<l...@xharbour.com.br> wrote:
>>>> this changes in my opinion, is to make more incompatible the api for
>>>> developers
>>> No technical merit in these changes then?
>> Im not discussing merit, but compatility. One os the changes, has break
>> hwgui  ( the new hb_parv*/hb_storv*)
>> Now imaging how many 3rd parties has to have two version of same code due
>> this changes.
> 
> Look from another perspective: how many people were forced to fix the
> usage of hb_par*() with 2 or more arguments, which was broken by
> design and not GPF-safe.
> 
> This change will probably engage 3rd-party RDD developers, so let them
> say. I have one simple RDD which inherits from DBF, and these simple
> changes are no problem to me. BTW I guess that most RDD developers
> already have 2 versions of code - for Harbour and for xHarbour.
> 
> -- Ph.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> xHarbour-developers mailing list
> xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
> 
> __________ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas 
> de virus 4202 (20090630) __________
> 
> ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.
> 
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> 
> 



__________ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4202 (20090630) __________

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
xHarbour-developers mailing list
xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers

Reply via email to