Thank you Luiz!
In XCC I get these warnings and errors:
\xHarbour\contrib\gtwvw\gtwvw.c(4586): warning: Inconsistent linkage
for 'hb_gt_wvwGetXYFromColRowRect' previously declared at
\xHarbour\contrib\gtwvw\hbgtwvw.h(609).
\xHarbour\contrib\gtwvw\gtwvw.c(7908): error: Cast from 'struct
app_data'
Hello Eduardo,
If I try to execute
? oemtohtml()
the program hangs
Please someone can test and comfirm my fix on this:
At line 4373 from source\tip\thtml.prg file:
Yes, this fixes it! Thanks Eduardo!
This change is not yet on CVS Eduardo. Can you commit please? Thanks!
Patrick
Patrick
Fixed
see
2009-08-24 09:30 UTC-0300 Luiz Rafael Culik luiz at xharbour.com.br
! contrib/gtwvw/gtwvw.c
! contrib/gtwvw/hbgtwvw.h
minor ajust to typecast
Regards
luiz
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Mast, xHarbour. patrick.m...@xharbour.com
To: Luiz Rafael Culik
Hi All,
Any reason that the __Run() function was extended to have 2nd optional BYREF
argument to return the result, instead of direct return code:
__Run( cCommand ) - nResult
?
Ron
--
Let Crystal Reports handle
Phil
Some of your changelog entries is not on the changelog file, can you review?
Regards
Luiz
- Original Message -
From: Phil Krylov p...@newstar.rinet.ru
To: xHarbour Developers Mailing List
xharbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:03 PM
Subject:
Hi Ron,
I think it was for compatibility with original __run().
Best regards.
Maurilio.
Ron Pinkas wrote:
Hi All,
Any reason that the __Run() function was extended to have 2nd optional BYREF
argument to return the result, instead of direct return code:
__Run( cCommand ) - nResult
Phil
I'v updated my cvs before doing the commit and your entries wasnt their
already
Regards
Luiz
- Original Message -
From: Phil Krylov p...@newstar.rinet.ru
To: Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes l...@xharbour.com.br
Cc: xHarbour Developers Mailing List
* source/tip/thtml.prg
! fixed ansitohtml() to parse char when alone.
f.e. ? oemtohtml()
regards,
Eduardo
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
Maurilio,
Many thanks, I'm very sorry I missed it originally, because I do have strong
reservation. Adding a return value to __Run() would NOT have broken any
Clipper compatibility since Clipper's __Run() does not return any value, and
in Clipper the return value of a function which does not
9 matches
Mail list logo
