your question, I would vote YES, but I believe it should be a
> community decision, made by the current active members on this developer list.
>
> Again, my most sincere thanks, for your many years of so many great
> contributions, as well as your kindness and consideration of xHarbour.
&
ers.
best regards,
Przemek
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Ron Pinkas wrote:
> Many thanks for your help Przemek. :-)
>
> Please fell welcome to import your compiler expression GCs to xHarbour. We
> would all be very grateful.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ron
>
> > On Apr 20,
Hi Ron and Walter.
The problem can be exploited by many different
syntax errors.
When syntax error appears we cannot trust that
our expression destructor is executed because
we do not know where exactly the error was
detected by bison and if all sub expressions
created so far have internal
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Andi Jahja wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
I randomly get this error message:
WITH OBJECT excessive nesting!
As per default build, HB_MAX_WITH_OBJECT is preset to 64.
But I am very sure that my application does not have that much nests.
This occurs when I repeatedly execute sub
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Ron Pinkas wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for late respone.
Please only remember that I was not alone in Harbour modifications in
last years. Viktor made really great job in general code and used types
cleanup. Mindaugas added important extensions to compiler and HVM/RTL
code,
On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Ron Pinkas wrote:
Hi,
I fully agree with Przemek, that we can NOT aford to drop support for Linux.
There are too many reasons to count, and Przmek did mention most of them.
I would only add, that many prospective open source contributors are Linux
users.
As to the
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013, Andi Jahja wrote:
Hi Andi,
Seems no comment at all, particularly from what ppl call *nix users. BTW,
does anyone here have a thought about it?
I think that xHarbour lost most of them.
FYI, we stuck releasing versions officially because there's no-one
interested in
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:
Hi Enrico,
There is no such limitation in Harbour, xHarbour and in Clipper.
Great! I'm happy to ear that! :-)
So all what you need is investing few minutes and learn how PP
in Clipper and [x]Harbour works and then use correct syntax.
Sorry,
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:
Hi,
Dear friends, I don't get this to work in ADS RDD:
RDDINFO( RDDI_MEMOEXT, .DBT )
? RDDINFO( RDDI_MEMOEXT ) // still returns .fpt
I had a look inside ads1.c and found this:
static const char * adsMemoExt( int iFileType )
{
switch(
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote:
I see the previous changes of Phil, some days ago
i decided not port to xharbour (const) beacause it only
changes speed by security under some compilers. I remark
some compilers (BCC for example almoust at my machine)
I can't see how the
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
Hi,
Results of test:
withconst 32.41 seconds
without const 32.34 seconds
Press any key to continue...
Demostration :
#DEFINE REC_TEST 1
FUNCTION MAIN()
LOCAL p, n
REQUEST HB_GT_WIN
p := Seconds()
FOR n := 1 TO
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Ron Pinkas wrote:
Hi,
I do not want to discard your work but such modifications as in
xHarbour are technical nonsense.
You copy code of existing DBF* RDDs and then you change their names
adding 'RE' prefix and replace hb_file*() calls with hb_fileNet*().
...
As I
On Tue, 05 May 2009, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
Hi,
2009-01-12 15:15 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/source/vm/fm.c
* harbour/include/hbwmain.c
* use HeapAlloc( GetProcessHeap(), ... ) instead of LocalAlloc()
when HB_FM_WIN32_ALLOC macro is set
On Mon, 04 May 2009, Patrick Mast, xHarbour.com Inc. wrote:
Same here:
contrib\rdd_ads\ads1.c(575) : error C3861: 'HB_IS_TIMESTAMP':
identifier not found
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Andi Jahja xharb...@telkom.net.id wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 10:28:18 +0200
Miguel Angel Marchuet
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Ron Pinkas wrote:
3. For many years when the Harbour project was completely dormant,
practically all commits were borrowed from my work, or other xHarbour
developers, and I vividly remember how frustrating it was having to ask for
due credit, and seeing it falling on
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
DATETIME was implemented by Walter Negro, I made needed adjustments to the
RDD and José Jimenez in TOleAuto.
As you know...
I do not know about any RDD DAYTIME code created by Walter which was ported
to Harbour. Can you show me the peace of
16 matches
Mail list logo
